1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x1998001000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent attenuation and enhancement of the earthworm main muscle contraction generator response induced by repeated stimulation of a peripheral neuron

Abstract: Responses evoked in the earthworm, Amynthas hawayanus, main muscle contraction generator M-2 (postsynaptic mechanical-stimulus-sensitive) neuron by threshold mechanical stimuli in 2-s intertrial intervals (ITI) were used as the control or unconditioned responses (UR). Their attenuation induced by decreasing these intervals in nonassociative conditioning and their enhancement induced by associating the unconditioned stimuli (US) to a train of short (0.1 s) hyperpolarizing electrical substitutive conditioning st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slight physiological or morphological variation may actually be the rule rather than the exception. This predetermined bias of selection was nevertheless upheld in this article because a precise quantitative measurement was a necessity for comparing the muscle contraction magnitude modifications in the two subsequent studies (1,2). But this predetermined bias in their isolation and identification imposed a limit on the comparability of the results of this article to the stimulus-response paradigm in intact preparations tested by experimental psychological methods (15,16), where not only all segmental neuronal and muscular circuits but also intersegmental circuits from the highest to the lowest centers are included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Slight physiological or morphological variation may actually be the rule rather than the exception. This predetermined bias of selection was nevertheless upheld in this article because a precise quantitative measurement was a necessity for comparing the muscle contraction magnitude modifications in the two subsequent studies (1,2). But this predetermined bias in their isolation and identification imposed a limit on the comparability of the results of this article to the stimulus-response paradigm in intact preparations tested by experimental psychological methods (15,16), where not only all segmental neuronal and muscular circuits but also intersegmental circuits from the highest to the lowest centers are included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are the central nervous system (2,(5)(6)(7)11), the peripheral nervous system (2,7), the muscle system which transmits impulses through their nexi (5,7,19) and the spontaneous activation in a single muscle cell membrane (20). The experiments in this section were carried out to determine which of them is the "main" generator source which generates the largest percentage of the muscle contraction and to isolate it by differential sectioning ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Isolation Of the Main Generator Source Of Muscle Contractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation