1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x1998000100013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasitic infections in germfree animals

Abstract: The association of vertebrate hosts with the indigenous microbiota and its effect on the response to infections has long been a subject of scientific curiosity. From the first theory supported by Louis Pasteur that life would be impossible in the absence of associated microorganisms to the development of germfree mammals for research, a lot was learned about how the normal microbiota influences the environment in which pathogens may find themselves. In the present review, we attempt to summarize the more recen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cytokine production profile did not differ in both; however macrophages from GF mice were not as efficient at killing parasites as conventional mice, suggesting an important role of microbiota in macrophage activation ( Oliveira et al 2005 ). Vieira et al (1998) also found similar results with GF mice failing to resolve lesions after 13 weeks of L. major infection, in contrast with the conventional mice. Despite this, the cytokine profiles were indistinguishable in both groups.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cytokine production profile did not differ in both; however macrophages from GF mice were not as efficient at killing parasites as conventional mice, suggesting an important role of microbiota in macrophage activation ( Oliveira et al 2005 ). Vieira et al (1998) also found similar results with GF mice failing to resolve lesions after 13 weeks of L. major infection, in contrast with the conventional mice. Despite this, the cytokine profiles were indistinguishable in both groups.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…GF mice macrophages, albeit capable of producing nitric oxide (NO) in response to leishmanial infection, were no able to destroy the parasites. Absence of the normal indigenous microbiota was suggested as cause of increased susceptibility to L. major infection ( Vieira et al 1998 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two to 5 days after intake stop of S. boulardii, the yeast was no longer found in the feces of the host (Blehaut et al 1989). Among the 103 candidate yeasts, the probiotics evaluated by Tiago et al (2009), including 48 of the genus Pichia, only three (Pichia kluyveri, Metschnikowia reukaufii, and Zygosaccharomyces fermentati) were found in the feces 4 days after interrupting the supply (Vieira et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with this latter hypothesis and in contrast to what was observed in SPF BALB/c mice, we found that anti-IL-4-treated GF BALB/c mice did not control the replication of the parasite and remained susceptible to L. major infection. Likewise, a recent study has shown that GF Swiss mice developed progressive lesions when infected with L. major, whereas SPF Swiss mice only make small lesions and eventually heal (29). Lastly, macrophages derived from the spleen of GF mice expressed reduced amounts of MHC class II molecules (30) and exhibited impaired ability to secrete IL-1, IL-6, and IL-12 (31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Cd62lmentioning
confidence: 99%