1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x1997001200018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal projections of area 17 in Cebus monkeys: metric features, and modular and laminar distribution

Abstract: Metric features and modular and laminar distributions of intrinsic projections of area 17 were studied in Cebus apella. Anterogradely and retrogradely labeled cell appendages were obtained using both saturated pellets and iontophoretic injections of biocytin into the operculum. Laminar and modular distributions of the labeled processes were analyzed using Nissl counterstaining, and/or cytochrome oxidase and/or NADPH-diaphorase histochemistry. We distinguished three labeled cell types: pyramidal, star pyramidal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies in incomplete reconstructions from which only metric features that do not depend on the order of the segments are suitable for analysis. As previously recommended elsewhere (Amorim and Picanco-Diniz, 1997;Gomes-Leal et al, 2002;Rocha et al, 2007) we have done similar choice in the present morphometric analysis, providing consistent quantitative data through density values in [ ( ) T D $ F I G ] , and field area (E) of axon trees of the S1 to S2 somatosensory ipsilateral projections in the agouti. Significant distinctions between axon fragments Types I and II (left column) and between hind and forelimb (right column) are indicated by asterisk (two-tailed Student's t-test, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This implies in incomplete reconstructions from which only metric features that do not depend on the order of the segments are suitable for analysis. As previously recommended elsewhere (Amorim and Picanco-Diniz, 1997;Gomes-Leal et al, 2002;Rocha et al, 2007) we have done similar choice in the present morphometric analysis, providing consistent quantitative data through density values in [ ( ) T D $ F I G ] , and field area (E) of axon trees of the S1 to S2 somatosensory ipsilateral projections in the agouti. Significant distinctions between axon fragments Types I and II (left column) and between hind and forelimb (right column) are indicated by asterisk (two-tailed Student's t-test, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This result corroborates our working hypothesis that long-range collinear interactions in V1 constitute the anatomical substrate for the completion phenomena we observe. V1 horizontal connections, for example, give rise to specialized circuits, which shape the direction and orientation tuning of the neurons by linking columns with similar response properties ( Amorim and Picanco-Diniz 1997 , Bosking et al 1997 ; Buzas et al 1998 , 2001 ; Crook et al 1996 , 1997 , 1998 ; de Amorim and Picanco-Diniz 1996 , Kisvarday et al 1997 , 2000 ; Sincich and Blasdel 2001 ). In this way, neurons inside the BSR would receive long-distance input (up to ∼8 mm, see Calford et al 2003 ; Chino et al 1995 ; Gilbert et al 1996 ) from neurons with similar response properties located outside the BSR, explaining the relevance of collinear flanks to the active completion process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V2 is a belt of cortex located in the opercular region of the occipital pole in front of V1. It is limited posteriorly by V1, except in the most anterior region of the calcarine sulcus, which borders the area of prostriata of Sanides ( 14 , 21 ). V2 is limited anteriorly by V3 except at the representation of the fovea region at the lateral surface between the lunate sulcus and the inferior occipital sulcus, where V2 borders V4 21 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied the receptive field properties of V2 neurons before and after the inactivation of a small portion of area V2 in the capuchin monkey ( Cebus apella ). Several aspects of the visual system of this New World monkey, including the thalamic organization ( 16 - 18 ), intrinsic circuitry of V1 ( 19 - 21 ), and topographical characteristics of areas V1, V2, MT, and V4 ( 14 , 22 - 25 ) have been studied for almost two decades, making this monkey a suitable experimental model for this study. In addition, we recently studied the effect of GABA inactivation of visual area MT ( 26 ), visual area V4 ( 27 ), and previously (2004) the pulvinar ( 28 ) on the direction and orientation selectivity of V2 neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%