Ultrassonografia do colo uterino versus índice de Bishop como preditor do parto vaginal

Aragão, José Richelmy Brazil Frota; Feitosa, Francisco Edson de Lucena; Júnior, Carlos Augusto Alencar; Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos; Amorim, Melânia Maria Ramos; Júnior, Renato Passini

doi:10.1590/s0100-72032011001100007

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unlike other reports, which found either Bishop score or cervical length to be superior, we were not able to find one test to be better than the other. Although cervical length is a more objective measure, the Bishop score with its five components allows better evaluation of cervical ripeness, and perhaps the association of both markers would improve the accuracy of predicting labor induction.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery

Cubal

Carvalho

Ferreira

et al. 2013

J of Obstet and Gynaecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery

Cubal

Carvalho

Ferreira

et al. 2013

J of Obstet and Gynaecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bishop's score is a good indicator of preinduction of cervical status and a predictor of vaginal delivery; hence, it was used for studying the effect of intervention on cervical status in our study [9]. Our study results have shown significant change in Bishop's score after one week in breast stimulation group as compared to control group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Breast Stimulation in Low-Risk Primigravidas at Term: Does It Aid in Spontaneous Onset of Labour and Vaginal Delivery? A Pilot Study

Singh

Tripathi

Mala

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims. The aim of the study was to elicit the safety and efficacy of breast stimulation as an intervention to prevent postdatism and as an aid in spontaneous onset of labour. Methods. Primigravidas with cephalic presentation, without any high-risk factor, were recruited between 36 to 38 weeks of gestation. 200 patients were recruited and randomized into two groups (n = 100). Breast stimulation was advised to one group but not to the other group. Bishop's scoring was done at 38 weeks and repeated at 39 weeks of gestation. Maternal and fetal outcomes were compared in two groups. Result. Bishop's score changed from 3.12 (±1.01) to 3.9 (±1.08) in control group and from 3.02 (±0.82) to 6.08 (±1.29) in breast stimulation group after one week (P value < 0.0001). The period of gestation at delivery was 39.5 (±2.3) weeks in control group and 39.2 (±2.8) weeks in intervention group (P value: 0.044). There were increased chances of vaginal delivery in intervention group (P value: 0.046). Duration of labor, hyperstimulation, presence of meconium stained liquor, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion. Breast stimulation in low-risk primigravidas helps in cervical ripening and increases chances of vaginal delivery.

show abstract

The role of sonographic cervical length in labor induction at term

Papillon-Smith

Abenhaim

2014

J of Clinical Ultrasound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to review the literature examining the role of ultrasound in the induction of labor. Databases including Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and UpToDate were searched and current guidelines from the SOGC, the ACOG, the RCOG, and the RANZCOG were reviewed. Although studies have not demonstrated the superiority of cervical sonography to the Bishop score, the evidence indicates that sonography could be useful in planning induction of labor, significantly reducing the need for cervical ripening agents. A more comprehensive method integrating both sonography and digital exam may be more appropriate.

show abstract

Ultrassonografia do colo uterino versus índice de Bishop como preditor do parto vaginal

Abstract: ultrasonographic measurement of the uterine cervix was not a good predictor of evolution to vaginal delivery among patients with misoprostol-induced labor. Bishop's score was a better predictor of vaginal delivery under these circumstances.

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery

Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery

Breast Stimulation in Low-Risk Primigravidas at Term: Does It Aid in Spontaneous Onset of Labour and Vaginal Delivery? A Pilot Study

The role of sonographic cervical length in labor induction at term

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About