Uso da bromocriptina associado a hiperestimulação ovariana controlada em pacientes más respondedoras

A New Concept for Central Wedge Resection in Labiaplasty

“…However, there are no established anatomic criteria for labial hypertrophy, and there is no consensus in the literature about the grades of labial hypertrophy. The classification system first described by Franco and Franco [6] The majority of women were satisfied with their procedure. Only 9.7% of patients in the RV group felt somewhat dissatisfied because of wound healing complications, asymmetry, and scarring, and 3.5% of patients in the NV group felt somewhat dissatisfied because of asymmetry and edema (online suppl.…”

“…Another study based on data about natural female genital variation proposed an objective definition for labia minora hypertrophy with a width of no <50 mm or a difference of >30 mm in labia minora asymmetry [13]. In 2015, Gonzalez [14] modified the standard set by Franco and Franco [6] by adding further dimensions: location of hypertrophy and symmetric and asymmetric classifiers; the abovementioned definitions are all of the available classification systems. To date, there are still no set criteria on how to best define this condition to select a definitive procedure.…”

“…To date, there are still no set criteria on how to best define this condition to select a definitive procedure. Our patients' labial hypertrophy was classified before surgery based on the Franco and Franco [6] classification, and the corresponding procedure was selected to repair the deformities. The increasing exposure of female nudity in the media has led to women considering a narrow ideal appearance of genitalia.…”