2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69912011000500006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resultados clínicos e satisfação dos pacientes após blefaroplastia inferior

Abstract: Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 25 surgical patients undergoing traditional lower blepharoplasty and routine lateral canthopexy; Group 2 consisted of 25 patients undergoing lower blepharoplasty with fat bags transposition and routine lateral canthopexy. We used the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale UNIFESP / EPM to assess patients' self-esteem. We also requested the participation of three independent surgeons, who examined the pre and postoperative photographs and quantified the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we assessed the outcomes of our novel surgical technique using PROM scores and patient satisfaction assessment scores, whereas previous articles have used distances between eyes or performed subjective evaluations. [24][25][26] Some of them focused on the postoperative complications, and a widely accepted criteria that were standardized to measure the outcome results of double eyelidplasty with epicanthoplasty were short.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we assessed the outcomes of our novel surgical technique using PROM scores and patient satisfaction assessment scores, whereas previous articles have used distances between eyes or performed subjective evaluations. [24][25][26] Some of them focused on the postoperative complications, and a widely accepted criteria that were standardized to measure the outcome results of double eyelidplasty with epicanthoplasty were short.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%