2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69912007000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profilaxia antimicrobiana na cirurgia bariátrica

Abstract: OBJETIVO: Analisar os resultados da incidência de infecção do sítio cirúrgico com três diferentes esquemas antimicrobianos. MÉTODO: No período de Janeiro de 1999 a Dezembro de 2004 foram realizadas 716 cirurgias para o tratamento da Obesidade mórbida, seguindo a técnica proposta por Fobi/Capella. Foram estudados comparativamente três grupos de pacientes: Grupo I - (185) em que foi realizada a profilaxia antimicrobiana com ampicilina/sulbactam, na dose de 3g em duas doses; Grupo II (280) em que a profilaxia foi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beneficial effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of SSI in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial, but in this study we identified two cases (0.8%) of SSI, where a patient received antibiotic prophylaxis and the other not 18,19 . Although there was a higher risk of SSI among patients who did not receive antibioticprophilaxy, the ratio of prevalence was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Melo Melo Melo Melomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The beneficial effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of SSI in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial, but in this study we identified two cases (0.8%) of SSI, where a patient received antibiotic prophylaxis and the other not 18,19 . Although there was a higher risk of SSI among patients who did not receive antibioticprophilaxy, the ratio of prevalence was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Melo Melo Melo Melomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The lack of a control group in the study, however, makes impossible a conclusion about the influence of this procedure. In another trial 19 , patients were allocated in three groups for antibiotic prophylaxis (ampicillin/ sulbactam, ceftriaxone or ertapenem) and the lower rate of infection was observed among patients receiving ertapenem (rates of SSI = 3.78%, 6.81%, and 1.99% for groups receiving ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftriaxone, and ertapenem, respectively).…”
Section: Studies Not Involving Cefazolinmentioning
confidence: 99%