2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162013000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining techniques for identification of spectrally homogeneous areas using NDVI temporal profiles of soybean crop

Abstract: The aim of this study was to group temporal profiles of 10-day composites NDVI product by similarity, which was obtained by the SPOT Vegetation sensor, for municipalities with high soybean production in the state of Paraná, Brazil, in the 2005/2006 cropping season. Data mining is a valuable tool that allows extracting knowledge from a database, identifying valid, new, potentially useful and understandable patterns. Therefore, it was used the methods for clusters generation by means of the algorithms K-Means, M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of just one or a few parcels for each type of crop might not allow for the identification of the standard pattern for each crop along its growth cycle, for one given region, because of noise and clouds in the satellite images and the lack of representativity. Thus, it is more useful to consider a broad set of crop parcels, with similar phenological behaviour, to extract average crop data values, as performed by Esquerdo et al (2011) and Johann et al (2013Johann et al ( , 2016, which are more representative and reliable than those individually obtained, reducing uncertainty resulting from sensor errors and cloud cover and improving data reliability when IWR is calculated at a regional or irrigation perimeter level. Hence, two different approaches were adopted to retrieve crop data as follows:…”
Section: Crop Data Retrieval From Eo Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of just one or a few parcels for each type of crop might not allow for the identification of the standard pattern for each crop along its growth cycle, for one given region, because of noise and clouds in the satellite images and the lack of representativity. Thus, it is more useful to consider a broad set of crop parcels, with similar phenological behaviour, to extract average crop data values, as performed by Esquerdo et al (2011) and Johann et al (2013Johann et al ( , 2016, which are more representative and reliable than those individually obtained, reducing uncertainty resulting from sensor errors and cloud cover and improving data reliability when IWR is calculated at a regional or irrigation perimeter level. Hence, two different approaches were adopted to retrieve crop data as follows:…”
Section: Crop Data Retrieval From Eo Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop data can be estimated using acquired earth observation (EO) data, along the crop growth cycle, at time intervals suitable for the detection of changes in crop phenology (D'Urso & Calera Belmonte, 2006;Vilar, 2015;Vilar et al, 2015;Navarro et al, 2016;Rolim et al, 2016). Presently, the availability of free and open access to high spatial resolution EO data with a short revisit time allows for accurate crop parameter estimation as well as crop growth cycle characterization, improving the identification of each growth cycle stage, which is often imperceptible when lower temporal resolution data are used (El Hajj et al, 2009;D'Urso et al, 2010;Ramme et al, 2010;Johann et al, 2013;Johann et al, 2016;Navarro et al, 2016;Rolim et al, 2016;Grzegozewski et al, 2017;Toureiro et al, 2017). EO methodologies have been widely used for crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and IWR estimation because of the reflective properties of vegetation that allow one to estimate crop biophysical parameters and plant processes such as transpiration (Neale et al, 1989;Calera Belmonte et al, 2005;D'Urso et al, 2010;Paço et al, 2014;Vuolo et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2016;Oliveira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesta pesquisa, usaram-se também dados de EVI (HUETE et al, 2002), provenientes do produto MOD13Q1 do tile h13v11, com 250 metros de resolução espacial (NASA, 2014), da série temporal, entre os dias 225 (ano de 2011) e 113 (ano de 2012) do calendário juliano, ou seja, de 13-08-2011 a 22-04-2012 do calendário gregoriano, contabilizando 17 imagens para contemplar todo o ciclo de desenvolvimento da cultura da soja (da pré-semeadura até à colheita) no Estado. Foram gerados os perfis espectrotemporais médios de EVI para os 351 municípios, como exemplifica a Figura 2 para o município de Guaíra (Figura 1), considerando apenas os pixels do mapeamento da soja dentro do perímetro de cada município (Figura 1), seguindo a metodologia adotada por JOHANN et al (2013). Este procedimento foi operacionalizado com um sistema de extração de dados de imagens em linguagem de programação "interactive data language" (IDL), desenvolvido por ESQUERDO et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…If compared to the algorithm K-means, EM algorithm results had greater differences for MAs with 3 (Figures 2b and 3b) and 4 (Figures 2c and 3c) clusters. This fact is which is justified by the heuristics used by each grouping algorithm (K-means and EM) to generate the clusters, which had already been observed by Johann et al (2013). Although Weka does not offer the error rate of the groupings conducted with EM, it enables visualizing the distribution of the points among the clusters (Table 3).…”
Section: Data Mining For the Assessment Of Management Areas In Precismentioning
confidence: 99%