2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162008000300009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational modeling for irrigated agriculture planning. Part II: risk analysis

Abstract: Techniques of evaluation of risks coming from inherent uncertainties to the agricultural activity should accompany planning studies. The risk analysis should be carried out by risk simulation using techniques as the Monte Carlo method. This study was carried out to develop a computer program so-called P-RISCO for the application of risky simulations on linear programming models, to apply to a case study, as well to test the results comparatively to the @RISK program. In the risk analysis it was observed that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few of such models are Deterministic Linear Programming (DLP) model, Chance Constraint Linear Programming Model (Sethi et al 2006), multiple stage linear programming (Martina et al 2015), dynamic programming (Sharma et al 2009), Fuzzy Goal Programming (Sharma et al 2007, Mirkarimi et al 2013, Quadratic programming (Manos and Kitsopanidis 1986), target MOTAD model (Maleka 1993, Boustani and Mohammadi 2010, Zareian et al 2013and Wondimagegn 2014. Some studies developed a computer program socalled P-RISCO for the application of risky simulations on linear programming models (Borges-Junior et al 2008, Pant et al 2010. Sethi et al (2006) developed the Deterministic linear programming (DLP) and chance-constrained linear programming (CCLP) models as a non-structural measure to allocate available land and water resources optimally on seasonal basis to maximize the net annual return from the study area.…”
Section: Various Approaches For Crop Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few of such models are Deterministic Linear Programming (DLP) model, Chance Constraint Linear Programming Model (Sethi et al 2006), multiple stage linear programming (Martina et al 2015), dynamic programming (Sharma et al 2009), Fuzzy Goal Programming (Sharma et al 2007, Mirkarimi et al 2013, Quadratic programming (Manos and Kitsopanidis 1986), target MOTAD model (Maleka 1993, Boustani and Mohammadi 2010, Zareian et al 2013and Wondimagegn 2014. Some studies developed a computer program socalled P-RISCO for the application of risky simulations on linear programming models (Borges-Junior et al 2008, Pant et al 2010. Sethi et al (2006) developed the Deterministic linear programming (DLP) and chance-constrained linear programming (CCLP) models as a non-structural measure to allocate available land and water resources optimally on seasonal basis to maximize the net annual return from the study area.…”
Section: Various Approaches For Crop Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quando se aplica simulação de risco, o enfoque é na variável de saída, buscandose gerar, com base nas distribuições de probabilidade das variáveis e parâmetros de entrada e em correlações entre essas variáveis e parâmetros, a função de probabilidade acumulada para a variável de saída. Já na análise de sensibilidade o enfoque é sobre as variáveis e parâmetros de entrada, ou seja, verificase o impacto de variações em cada variável ou parâmetro de entrada isoladamente, sobre determinada variável de saída (Borges Júnior et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified