2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-67622012000100019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferenças florísticas e estruturais entre fitofisionomias do cerrado em Assis, SP, Brasil

Abstract: Eduardo da Silva Pinheiro 2 e Giselda Durigan 3 RESUMO -A classificação das fitofisionomias tem-se constituído em desafio entre os pesquisadores da vegetação de cerrado, seja por não haver critérios florísticos ou quantitativos claros para sua separação, seja pelas alterações que sofrem ao longo do tempo. O objetivo deste estudo foi caracterizar três tipos fitofisionômicos de cerrado na Estação Ecológica de Assis, bem como verificar se são florística e, ou, estruturalmente distintos, buscando-se as melhores va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
26
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, despite the clear distinctions found in the structure and species composition of the three phytophysiognomies surveyed (Pinheiro and Durigan, 2012;Maracahipes-Santos et al, 2015), the causal factors are complex, and appear to depend on the interaction among the different chemical and granulometric properties of the soils, which have distinct effects. This complexity can be perceived in the second ordination axis, which separated the dense cerrado from the other two phytophysiognomies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this case, despite the clear distinctions found in the structure and species composition of the three phytophysiognomies surveyed (Pinheiro and Durigan, 2012;Maracahipes-Santos et al, 2015), the causal factors are complex, and appear to depend on the interaction among the different chemical and granulometric properties of the soils, which have distinct effects. This complexity can be perceived in the second ordination axis, which separated the dense cerrado from the other two phytophysiognomies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The larger trees kept growing, accumulating carbon and probably increasing the roughness of the canopy surface, which leads to increase in rain interception [58]. Eventually, the community structure instead resembles a tropical [30,33,54]. In the long term, due to competition, the community will probably be composed of even larger trees at lower densities.…”
Section: (A) Woody Encroachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEcA preserve includes 1312 ha of Cerrado vegetation and is one of the last remnants of Cerrado in the western part of São Paulo State. At present, the Cerrado in EEcA is composed of two distinct vegetation types: cerrado sensu stricto, a typical savanna physiognomy, in small patches, and cerradão, the forest type of Cerrado vegetation, in the majority of the area (Pinheiro & Durigan 2012). However, these vegetation types have changed considerably in the last decades, after suppression of fires and other disturbances, and the area occupied by Pteridium arachnoideum (Kaulf.)…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%