2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-67622011000600012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação dos valores estimados por amostragem na caracterização da estrutura de uma área de floresta na Amazônia com as informações registradas no censo florestal

Abstract: O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar valores estimados obtidos por amostragem com os valores verdadeiros registrados no Censo Florestal (inventário 100%) de uma área de floresta na Amazônia. Foi simulada uma amostragem sistemática, atendendo às exigências do IBAMA (BRASIL, 2007), com unidades amostrais de 2 ha e intensidade amostral de 14% em uma área de 1.000 ha, que foi submetida a um Censo Florestal. Neste e na simulação do inventário florestal, consideraram-se apenas a população com DAP > 40 cm e uma … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering all the tree species of the area under management in the Jamari National Forest, the values of density (trees ha -1 ) and baseline area (m² ha -1 ) were low when compared to the sampling studies performed in Acre (Cavalcanti et al, 2011) and in Mato Grosso (Ubialli et al, 2009). However, when analyzing only the commercial species, these values are compatible with the results of Cavalcanti et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Considering all the tree species of the area under management in the Jamari National Forest, the values of density (trees ha -1 ) and baseline area (m² ha -1 ) were low when compared to the sampling studies performed in Acre (Cavalcanti et al, 2011) and in Mato Grosso (Ubialli et al, 2009). However, when analyzing only the commercial species, these values are compatible with the results of Cavalcanti et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In tropical forests, the wide heterogeneity of species, complex spatial distributions of species and large number of rare species are factors that can cause high sampling errors (Ubialli et al 2009). Comparatively, for timber management, the sampling error allowed, according to IBAMA, is 10 % (Cavalcanti et al 2011), and the maximum error allowed in diagnostic inventory of Clusia spp. and Heteropsis spp., in accordance with Resolution COEMA no.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies sampling approaches for inventory are typically focused on analysis and ecological processes in the form of phenological or regeneration evaluations (D'Eça-Neves and Morellato 2004;Gama et al 2001) and/or the stock of wood in natural forests (Cavalcanti et al 2011;Piqué et al 2011) and plantations (Druszcz et al 2010;Fick 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X coordinate of each individual was obtained by means of the number of the mark and the distance of each tree in relation to it. Then, the next mark was attended to, executing the same work routine, and so on, until the last WU-16 mark was completed (Cavalcanti et al, 2011).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%