2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-54052011000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboração e validação de escala diagramática para avaliação da severidade de oídio em folhas de mamoeiro

Abstract: RESUMOCom o objetivo de facilitar e padronizar as avaliações da severidade de oídio (Streptopodium caricae) em folhas de mamoeiro elaborou-se e va lidou -se uma esca la diagramá tica com os segu intes níveis de severidade: 0,6; 1,2; 2,5; 5,0; 10,0 e 20,0%. Sem a escala, todos os avaliadores superestimaram a severidade da doença. Com a escala, os avaliadores obtiveram melhores níveis de acurácia, com erros absolutos Santos, P.H.D.; Vivas, M.; Silveira, S.F.; Silva, J.M.; Terra, C.E.P.S. Elaboração e validação d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most deviations were negative, indicating a tendency towards severity underestimation. These results are similar to those found in diagrammatic scale validation studies involving other pathosystems, such as fruit and leaf diseases of papaya (18,24) and brown eye spot in red and yellow coffee cherries (13). Accuracy of visual severity estimates without the diagrammatic scale indicated average R 2 values of 0.59, within the range from 0.20 to 0.79, and amplitude around 0.59.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Most deviations were negative, indicating a tendency towards severity underestimation. These results are similar to those found in diagrammatic scale validation studies involving other pathosystems, such as fruit and leaf diseases of papaya (18,24) and brown eye spot in red and yellow coffee cherries (13). Accuracy of visual severity estimates without the diagrammatic scale indicated average R 2 values of 0.59, within the range from 0.20 to 0.79, and amplitude around 0.59.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These scales can be used to standardize the severity estimation and reduce the subjective of disease severity visual estimates. The diagrammatic scales is expected to be easy and quick for a wide range of conditions with reproducible, accurate, and precise results (MALAGI et al, 2011;SACHS et al, 2011;SANTOS et al, 2011;YADAV et al, 2012). Accuracy refers to how faithful an estimate is from the actual amount of the evaluated disease, while precision corresponds to the confi dence and/or repeatability associated to such estimate (NUTTER JR. & SCHULTZ, 1995, ANGELOTTI et al, 2008MICHEREFF et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease severity was assessed on leaves with petiole attachment in the axil of newly opened flowers, on a diagrammatic scale for powdery mildew proposed by Santos et al (2011), in December 2011and February 2012. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with two replications, evaluting 59 genotypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%