2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-512x2013000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nietzsche and Neo-Kantian historiography: points of contact

Abstract: RESUMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many readers, who approach Spengler specifically for his views on the cyclical nature of history, it is by no means apparent how many of his obscure philosophical sections relate to the grand narrative of Decline . However, if one skips the ‘metaphysics’, which Mazlish (1966: 344) describes as ‘largely a farrago of pretentious and contradictory nonsense’, and sticks to the detailed historical sections, everything seems to make a lot more sense. And this, I argue, is what most commentators on Decline tend to do.…”
Section: ‘Torturous’ Prose and The Character Of Spengler's Kantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For many readers, who approach Spengler specifically for his views on the cyclical nature of history, it is by no means apparent how many of his obscure philosophical sections relate to the grand narrative of Decline . However, if one skips the ‘metaphysics’, which Mazlish (1966: 344) describes as ‘largely a farrago of pretentious and contradictory nonsense’, and sticks to the detailed historical sections, everything seems to make a lot more sense. And this, I argue, is what most commentators on Decline tend to do.…”
Section: ‘Torturous’ Prose and The Character Of Spengler's Kantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in addition to Spengler's complicated engagement with Kant , a key factor in the neglect of his role in Spengler's philosophy in secondary literature is the fact that Spengler's Kant bears only a family resemblance to what most scholars would recognise as Kant's philosophy. Due to the fact that Spengler holds that the perception of Time and Space is different for the people of different cultures, Mazlish (1966: 328) states that ‘Spengler's vision is not Kantian’. Costello, similarly, argues against a Kantian influence, saying that ‘Spengler held, contrary to Kant, that the mental concept for space was environmentally and culturally determined and not an a priori pattern in the mind’ (Costello, 1993: 57).…”
Section: ‘Torturous’ Prose and The Character Of Spengler's Kantmentioning
confidence: 99%