Hegel e W. Benjamin: variações em torno da crise da arte na época moderna

Abstract

Este artigo analisa e compara a reflexão de Hegel e de W. Benjamin sobre a crise da arte na época moderna, a partir de semelhanças e diferenças entre a tese do fim da arte, defendida pelo primeiro, e a concepção da perda da aura na arte, afirmada pelo segundo. Ao contrário de W Benjamin, que se detém na mudança do conceito de arte promovida pelos meios técnicos, Hegel pensa a transformação da arte a partir de um ponto de vista histórico amplo, que envolve toda a história da arte, desde os tempos antigos até a época moderna.<br>This article analyzes and compares Hegel's and W. Benjamin's reflections on the crisis of art in modern age, taking as its basis the resemblances and differences between (i) the thesis of the end of art, championed by the former, and (ii) the conception of aura decay in the work of art, posited by the latter. While W. Benjamin sticks to the change in the concept of art brought on by technique, Hegel considers the transformations in art from a broad historical point of view, from ancient times through modern age

IDENTITY OF TRYPSIN INHIBITORS ISOLATED FROM BOVINE LIVER and PANCREAS

“…A proteinase inhibitor uhich inhibits trypsin, chymotrypsin, kallikrein, and plasmin has been purified from liver by Werle and his collaborators (14,15,16). The inhibitor combines with kallikrein and with trypsin in a molar ratio of 1 : 1 and its inhibiting capacity seems identical with that of the pancreatic trypsin inhibitor.…”