2018
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2018000900009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Livestock intensification potential in Brazil based on agricultural census and satellite data analysis

Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential of livestock intensification in Brazil. Beef cattle stocking rates were estimated according to agricultural census data on livestock production in Brazilian municipalities. Pasture carrying capacity was obtained by combining moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (Modis) images of gross primary productivity and data on dry matter demand per animal unit (AU). Cattle stocking rate for Brazil, in 2014/2015, was 0.97 AU ha-1, and the carrying capacity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, with the historical stocking ratio, there would be a shortfall of 29 MHa (47 MHa-76 MHa) of area needed for pasture. Given the reduced pasture area that would be available, stocking rates would have to increase from an average of 1.64 AU ha −1 to 2.66 AU ha −1 (125 million heads/47 MHa), which is well within the potential stocking rates estimated by Arantes et al [85] under realistic intensification strategies. Without intensification of pastures, clearing for ranching would be likely to encroach on the native vegetation or spill over into other biomes such as the Atlantic Forest or Pantanal.…”
Section: Cropland Could Expand Without Clearing But Cattle Productiosupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because, with the historical stocking ratio, there would be a shortfall of 29 MHa (47 MHa-76 MHa) of area needed for pasture. Given the reduced pasture area that would be available, stocking rates would have to increase from an average of 1.64 AU ha −1 to 2.66 AU ha −1 (125 million heads/47 MHa), which is well within the potential stocking rates estimated by Arantes et al [85] under realistic intensification strategies. Without intensification of pastures, clearing for ranching would be likely to encroach on the native vegetation or spill over into other biomes such as the Atlantic Forest or Pantanal.…”
Section: Cropland Could Expand Without Clearing But Cattle Productiosupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Based on MAPA projections, the cattle herd in these two biomes could grow by 13% to 125 million head by 2028 [83]. If we apply historic stocking density averages for the region of 1.64 animal unit per hectare (AU ha −1 ) [85], a total area of 76 MHa (125 million head/1.64 AU ha −1 ) would be necessary to accommodate the future herd. If all cleared area suitable for cropland were converted to cropland, the remaining 47 MHa of cleared area unsuitable for cropland that will be available for pasture would not be enough to secure the area required under the MAPA projections without intensification of cattle production.…”
Section: Cropland Could Expand Without Clearing But Cattle Productiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elaborado pelos autores Na Tabela 1 encontram-se, para a série temporal do Brasil, os modelos quadráticos ajustados com valores codificados de zero a 43 como a variável X (ano codificado) e os dados de cabeça bovina como a variável Y, como também o modelo não ajustado. Modelos de regressão para o efetivo bovino do Brasil, por tipo de ajuste Arantes et al (2018). em um estudo que uniu dados do censo agrícola e de sensoriamento remoto sobre o potencial de intensificação da pecuária no Brasil, verificaram que há um potencial…”
unclassified
“…The PMP evaluated in this study was characterized by some degree of degradation, as is characteristic of poorly managed pastures in Brazil. To simulate the PMP on the DayCent model, the following procedures were adopted: low aboveground biomass production (~3.7 Mg ha −1 , Lilienfein and Wilcke, 2003), low stocking rate (~0.6 AU ha -1 , Arantes et al 2018), continuous grazing throughout the year (wet and dry periods) and no fertiliation. The main difference for the simulations of the conversion of PMP to FP (tropical humid climate condition) was the application of 10 g N m -2 year -1 and the increase in aboveground biomass production by ~6.4 Mg ha −1 (Wilcke and Lilienfein, 2004).…”
Section: Model Setup and Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%