2018
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2018000500001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and evaluation of selection signatures in sheep

Abstract: The recent development of genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays made it possible to carry out several studies with different species. The selection process can increase or reduce allelic (or genic) frequencies at specific loci in the genome, besides dragging neighboring alleles in the chromosome. This way, genomic regions with increased frequencies of specific alleles are formed, caracterizing selection signatures or selective sweeps. The detection of these signatures is important to characte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In scenarios of poor differentiation amongst individuals, the use of EHH-based tests to identify genomic areas under selection is preferable to F ST -based methods which need at least two different populations in dataset 1 . We further tested this running the software BayeScan v. 2.1 49 on our Djallonké genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In scenarios of poor differentiation amongst individuals, the use of EHH-based tests to identify genomic areas under selection is preferable to F ST -based methods which need at least two different populations in dataset 1 . We further tested this running the software BayeScan v. 2.1 49 on our Djallonké genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hapFLK package detects selection signatures based on differences in haplotype frequencies between all the populations ( Fariello et al, 2014 ). A number of studies have used iHS , Rsb , and other similar methods in the investigation of selection sweeps in sheep ( Paim et al, 2018 ; Alvarez et al, 2020 ), cattle ( Chen et al, 2016 ; Tijani et al, 2019 ), and other livestock species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal genotypes that possess relevant behavioral adaptations, such as appropriate patterns of selectivity (Meuret & Provenza, 2015;Provenza et al, 2003), would therefore be important genetic resources, but the underlying genetics are incompletely understood. Specific regions of the sheep genome have been shown to have been under postdomestication selection (e.g., Fariello et al, 2014;Paim et al, 2018), but no such region directly relating to grazing behavior has yet been identified. However, it is clear from quantitative genetics that some behavioral components of grazing behavior are heritable (Fogarty et al, 2009;Snowder et al, 2001), supporting the contention that grazing behavior is an outcome of genotype-environment interaction (Osoro et al, 1999;Rook, Dumont, et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%