2017
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2017001200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield performance of soybean and corn subjected to magnesium foliar spray

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of magnesium foliar spray on yield performance of soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays) cultivated in soil with adequate levels of base saturation and magnesium content in Brazil. The field trials were conducted on a Typic Hapludox cultivated with soybean and corn in the 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 crop seasons, respectively. Treatments consisted of Mg rates (50, 100, 250, 500, 1,000 and 1,500 g ha -1 and a control without Mg) applied during the V4, R1, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of Mg responses in this study may be attributed to two different conditions, the time of foliar application and the doses used. In Altarugio et al (2017) studies, the positive results from the foliar fertilization with Mg were obtained at R 2 , and in turn at V 4 the responses were inconstant, in a similar way to the present study. When considering the dose used Altarugio et al, (2017) obtained as the highest dose used 1.5 kg ha -1 , being the productivity peaks at R 2 obtained with 0.0883 kg ha -1 , well below the 6 kg ha -1 (Jezek et al, 2015) used in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of Mg responses in this study may be attributed to two different conditions, the time of foliar application and the doses used. In Altarugio et al (2017) studies, the positive results from the foliar fertilization with Mg were obtained at R 2 , and in turn at V 4 the responses were inconstant, in a similar way to the present study. When considering the dose used Altarugio et al, (2017) obtained as the highest dose used 1.5 kg ha -1 , being the productivity peaks at R 2 obtained with 0.0883 kg ha -1 , well below the 6 kg ha -1 (Jezek et al, 2015) used in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The absence of results obtained for magnesium foliar fertilization may be attributed to the soil initial condition of Mg, since the soil contents for this nutrient were between 0,8 and 1 cmol c dm -3 which are considered elevated (SBCS, 2004). However, in research of Altarugio et al (2017), it is reported that even in soil with adequate levels of Mg, its foliar application increases the SPAD index and the maize production components when applied at V 4 and R 2 . Thus, as Mg is a component of the chlorophyll molecule, it was expected an increase in the SPAD index of fertilized plants, in the same way as it was evidenced in Teklic et al (2009) studies, where the foliar fertilization with Mg in soybean increased the SPAD index and, consequently, the chlorophyll values and the crop photosynthetic rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the authors suggest using the Mg-100 dose, as it allowed to increase the Mg content of the bulbs (up to 1.4-fold, when compared to control), with a contextual increase in crop yield (up to 38%). There is evidence that fertilization of Mg via foliar spray can act to improve crop yield and quality [ 66 , 67 ]. The few studies on Mg biofortification show that both MgSO 4 ·7H 2 O and MgCl 2 are effective in enhancing the element content in vegetables.…”
Section: Agronomic Mineral Biofortificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segundo Altarugio et al (2017) a aplicação Mg via foliar é uma solução para diminuir a ocorrência de deficiência deste nutriente em culturas. Aplicação de nutrientes via foliar pode ser uma boa estratégia para aumentar a produtividade das culturas, sendo uma suplementação a adubação de base, pois gera uma resposta em um curto período de tempo.…”
Section: Segundo Stautunclassified