2016
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2016000800011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sanitary aspects and technological challenges of whole milk microfiltration at low temperatures

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of whole milk microfiltration at low temperatures on bacterial counts and on its shelf life. The microfiltration process was evaluated at two temperatures (30 and 50ºC) and compared with the slow pasteurization process. Both slow pasteurization and microfiltration reduced the initial counts of aerobic mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria, as well as total coliforms in whole milk. Microfiltration at 50ºC was as effective as the pasteurization process, si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was relevant to the generally used-optimum concentration range of the tested compounds, which was between 1.0 × 10 −4 and 0.5 mg/mL [ 27 , 32 , 38 ]. At the concentrations of protein hydrolysates below or equal to 2.5 mg/mL, WPI and the α-LA hydrolysate heated at 65 °C for 30 min, known as a low-temperature long time (LTLT) pasteurization [ 40 ], induced better cell viability compared to the control baseline. However, when heating was at 75 and 85 °C, each protein hydrolysate did not clearly induce cell viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was relevant to the generally used-optimum concentration range of the tested compounds, which was between 1.0 × 10 −4 and 0.5 mg/mL [ 27 , 32 , 38 ]. At the concentrations of protein hydrolysates below or equal to 2.5 mg/mL, WPI and the α-LA hydrolysate heated at 65 °C for 30 min, known as a low-temperature long time (LTLT) pasteurization [ 40 ], induced better cell viability compared to the control baseline. However, when heating was at 75 and 85 °C, each protein hydrolysate did not clearly induce cell viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%