2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2007000900020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for evaluation of root hairs of common bean genotypes

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to test a simple method for root hair evaluation of 21 common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes, most of them used in breeding programs in Brazil. Hairs of basal and primary roots of 5-day old seedlings, produced on germination paper with no phosphorus addition, were visually evaluated by a rating scale after staining with 0.05% trypan blue. The method reveals variability among the genotypes, and the standard error of the mean is relatively low.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2012WUS and 2013DUS, the roots from the third sampling (30 DAS) were stored in 70% ethanol. Root hairs on the basal 2−3cm of nodal roots were visually evaluated as described by Vieira et al (2007) by two to three researchers, each observing different roots, after staining with 0.05% trypan blue, and using a rating scale of 1−5 to rank root hair length and density ( Supplementary Table S1 ). Lateral roots were visually evaluated using a rating scale of 0−3 ( Supplementary Table S1 ) in 2013DUS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012WUS and 2013DUS, the roots from the third sampling (30 DAS) were stored in 70% ethanol. Root hairs on the basal 2−3cm of nodal roots were visually evaluated as described by Vieira et al (2007) by two to three researchers, each observing different roots, after staining with 0.05% trypan blue, and using a rating scale of 1−5 to rank root hair length and density ( Supplementary Table S1 ). Lateral roots were visually evaluated using a rating scale of 0−3 ( Supplementary Table S1 ) in 2013DUS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty common bean genotypes were assessed (Table 1). Among them, G 4000 and G 2333 were used as a standard for efficiency, and the Dor 364 genotype was used as a standard of inefficiency, as it is characterized as having roots with little vigor (Vieira et al, 2007 andVieira et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the benefits of root hairs are not evident in high‐fertility soils (Wen & Schnable, ), they do not appear to generate fitness trade‐offs, possibly because they have little impact on root metabolic costs (Bates & Lynch, ). Root hair phenotypes can be rapidly screened in seedlings in growth pouches (Vieira et al ., ), opening the possibility of direct phenotypic selection in poorly resourced breeding programs in developing countries. The substantial variation for root hair length and density in crop germplasm, the substantial benefit this variation affords for nutrient capture, and the ease of screening for these phenotypes call for aggressive deployment of this trait in crop breeding programs (Table ).…”
Section: Cross‐cutting Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%