2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832013000400013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partição de substâncias húmicas em solos brasileiros

Abstract: RESUMOAs substâncias húmicas (SH) representam o principal reservatório de carbono orgânico total do solo (COT) e sua partição entre diferentes frações de solubilidade em meio alcalino ou ácido pode guardar relação com o tipo de solo e manejo adotado. O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar a partição das SHs, de acordo com profundidade, tipo de solo, bioma e uso do solo no Brasil. Revisou-se a literatura, incluindo teses, dissertações, artigos e resumos em anais de eventos, em busca de dados sobre o teor de COT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Latosols and Gleysols have between 17 and 24% of carbon in the fulvic acid fraction, and between 10 and 18% of carbon in the humic acid fraction, respectively [33]. Santos et al [34] quantified the fractions of humic substances in different depths, soils, biomes, and vegetation cover in Brazil. The mean values and standard deviations (in parenthesis) of C-FAF, C-HAF, and C-HUM observed by them in forests were 21.2 g kg -1 (10.3), 16.6 g kg -1 (10.3), and 49.3 g kg -1 (17.5), respectively; in Latosol were 18.7 g kg -1 (9.4), 15.0 g kg -1 (7.3), and 54.0 g kg -1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latosols and Gleysols have between 17 and 24% of carbon in the fulvic acid fraction, and between 10 and 18% of carbon in the humic acid fraction, respectively [33]. Santos et al [34] quantified the fractions of humic substances in different depths, soils, biomes, and vegetation cover in Brazil. The mean values and standard deviations (in parenthesis) of C-FAF, C-HAF, and C-HUM observed by them in forests were 21.2 g kg -1 (10.3), 16.6 g kg -1 (10.3), and 49.3 g kg -1 (17.5), respectively; in Latosol were 18.7 g kg -1 (9.4), 15.0 g kg -1 (7.3), and 54.0 g kg -1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FA mean contents were higher in peat under forest clusters, whereas the HA mean contents were higher in peat under grasslands (Table 3). The FA contents of soils of Brazilian Forest Biomes (Amazonian Forest, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga and Cerrado) are higher than the HA contents and the inverse is observed in the Brazilian Grassland Biome (Pampa) and in pastures (Santos et al, 2013).…”
Section: Vegetation Typementioning
confidence: 88%
“…The first publications on humic substances were reported in 1786 with the extraction of humic acids from peat by Achard in Germany and by Vauquelin in 1797 with the extraction of plant residues. Between 1829 and 1837, studies to understand the origin and composition of humic substances began with the research conducted by Sprengel, reporting that more alkaline soils exhibited greater abundance of humic acids, making them more fertile [4]. In the 19th and 20th centuries, humic substances were often examined through the acid-base theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classification is based on their solubility in aqueous medium. Then, fulvic acids are soluble at acidic or alkaline pH, humic acids are soluble at alkaline pH, and humins are insoluble at any pH [4,6,7]. Researchers have been discussing, in recent years, models in order to explain the chemical structure of humic substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%