2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832011000500012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-relation between soybean yield and soil compaction under degraded pasture in Brazilian Savannah

Abstract: SUMMARYThe Cerrado (Brazilian Savannah) plays an important economic and financial role in the nation, since the pastures of this biome feed cattle for half of the domestic bovine meat productivity, and its agricultural fields produce a third of the country's grain. The variability and spatial dependence between the soil physical attributes and soybean yield were evaluated in a crop rotation planted on a degraded brachiaria pasture, on a dystroferric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the yield components, the average values for number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, mass of 100 grains, grain mass per plant, plant population and plant height were, respectively, 25, 2.0, 15.8 g, 6.9 g, 36.5 plants m -2 and 75.8 cm, different from those obtained by Dalchiavon et al (2011), who evaluated the soybean grain yield under no-tillage, in the region of Selvíria, and lower in terms of number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and grain mass per plant attributes, whose values corresponded, respectively, to 72.2 g, 2.2 g and 23 g. The number of pods per plant was lower than that of 36.6 obtained by Queiroz et al (2011), who studied the soybean grain yield in an Oxisol, in a crop rotation with brachiaria pasture, and of 72.2 observed by Dalchiavon & Carvalho (2012), evaluating soybean grain yield cultivated in a Oxisol under no-tillage. Possibly, the number of pods per plant was lower due to the increase in the soil bulk density, since, under stress conditions, the plant formed few grains in the pods, because the main biological objective of the crop is the dissemination of the species (Carvalho et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the yield components, the average values for number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, mass of 100 grains, grain mass per plant, plant population and plant height were, respectively, 25, 2.0, 15.8 g, 6.9 g, 36.5 plants m -2 and 75.8 cm, different from those obtained by Dalchiavon et al (2011), who evaluated the soybean grain yield under no-tillage, in the region of Selvíria, and lower in terms of number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and grain mass per plant attributes, whose values corresponded, respectively, to 72.2 g, 2.2 g and 23 g. The number of pods per plant was lower than that of 36.6 obtained by Queiroz et al (2011), who studied the soybean grain yield in an Oxisol, in a crop rotation with brachiaria pasture, and of 72.2 observed by Dalchiavon & Carvalho (2012), evaluating soybean grain yield cultivated in a Oxisol under no-tillage. Possibly, the number of pods per plant was lower due to the increase in the soil bulk density, since, under stress conditions, the plant formed few grains in the pods, because the main biological objective of the crop is the dissemination of the species (Carvalho et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Grain yield was low (Table 1), with an average value of 2,659 kg ha -1 , lower than the national average of 3,362 kg ha -1 (Conab 2017) and also lower in relation to that reported by Rosa Filho et al (2009) of 3,317.5 kg ha -1 , by Queiroz et al (2011) of 3,270 kg ha -1 and by Dalchiavon et al (2011) of 4,639.4 kg ha -1 . However, it is much higher than that of 1,215 kg ha -1 found by Lovera (2015), all carried out in the same soil under no-tillage in the region of Selvíria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the corn was harvested for silage the soil penetration resistance was higher until 0.12 meter; because in this system the traffic of machines is higher. The soil penetration resistance evaluated was higher than 3.0 Mpa, and it was considered a value above the critical level of 2.27 Mpa (Beutler, N. A. Centurion, J. F. Centurion, & Silva, 2006;Freddi, Centurion, Duarte, & Leonel, 2009) Vol. 10, No.…”
Section: Physical Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%