2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0085-56262007000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a gall midge Parkiamyia paraensis (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) on the Amazonian plant Parkia pendula (Fabaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, more developed and complex plants have a greater availability of meristem sites, which favor their colonization by endophytic herbivores (Larson & Whitham 1997, Esp ırito-Santo et al 2007). This contrasts with the situation found in some tree species, where the presence of these gallinducing insects may reduce the development and hence structural complexity of the host plant considerably (Teas & Mcewan 1982, Gonc ßalves-Alvim et al 1999, Fernandes et al 2007, Pincebourde & Casas 2015. Although A. germinans presented a high incidence of galls, the trees in all study sites were well developed, indicating that this parasitism does not affect the development or survival of the species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, more developed and complex plants have a greater availability of meristem sites, which favor their colonization by endophytic herbivores (Larson & Whitham 1997, Esp ırito-Santo et al 2007). This contrasts with the situation found in some tree species, where the presence of these gallinducing insects may reduce the development and hence structural complexity of the host plant considerably (Teas & Mcewan 1982, Gonc ßalves-Alvim et al 1999, Fernandes et al 2007, Pincebourde & Casas 2015. Although A. germinans presented a high incidence of galls, the trees in all study sites were well developed, indicating that this parasitism does not affect the development or survival of the species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…, Fernandes et al . , Pincebourde & Casas ). Although A. germinans presented a high incidence of galls, the trees in all study sites were well developed, indicating that this parasitism does not affect the development or survival of the species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is evidence that, under controlled conditions, plants are able to recover from galling insect attacks if sufficient resources are available, but there is no evidence that plants display this kind of compensatory response in field conditions when they are experiencing more stressful conditions [78]. Importantly, ecophysiological impact on galled plants is typically observed early on the galling process [31,79,80]. As the plant matures and grows larger, the sink-source relationship and impact on the host plant may diminish or reach an equilibrium point [81][82][83].…”
Section: Leaf Physiological Responses To Gallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of galling on a given plant seems to be an important factor in determining impact. For example, higher densities of galls were found to have greater impact on plant growth [31,32]. A study with Alnus glutinosa showed that heavily infested gall shoots had significantly smaller final leaf areas [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gallers may change the architecture of the infested plants at the attacked point as well as the whole organ or plant levels (Mani 1964;Silva et al 1996). Some gall-formers can considerably reduce seed production or reproductive performance of the plants, and therefore may serve as biological control agents (Fernandes et al 2007;Harris and Shorthouse 1996;Sopow et al 2003). On the other hand, gall-formers may enhance assimilation activity (Dorchin et al 2006) and compensatory growth of the host.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%