2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0085-56262005000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) associated with two species of Eugenia (Myrtaceae)

Abstract: ABSTRACT. New gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) associated with two species of Eugenia (Myrtaceae). Jorgenseniella eugeniae, gen. nov., sp. nov. and Dasineura marginalis, sp. nov. are described based on material obtained from leaf galls on Eugenia umbelliflora and E. rotundifolia (Myrtaceae) Insect galls are very frequent and abundant in Brazilian sand coastal plain (restinga), where the gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) represent the most diverse galling family and Myrtaceae the most attacked host plant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape and setation of the female's abdominal tergites 7 and 8 was not described for the South American species, and setation of the male gonostyli was shown for only two of them. In D. gigantea Angelo & Maia, the gonostylus is setose dorsally on its basal third (Angelo and Maia 1999), as in the two species from Leptospermum, whereas in D. marginalis Maia it is setose almost to its tip (Maia et al 2005). Differences are also found in the shape of the aedeagus, which is narrow and rounded apically in D. gigantea and D. marginalis Maia but truncated and notched in D. myrciariae Maia (Maia 1995).…”
Section: General Taxonomic Commentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shape and setation of the female's abdominal tergites 7 and 8 was not described for the South American species, and setation of the male gonostyli was shown for only two of them. In D. gigantea Angelo & Maia, the gonostylus is setose dorsally on its basal third (Angelo and Maia 1999), as in the two species from Leptospermum, whereas in D. marginalis Maia it is setose almost to its tip (Maia et al 2005). Differences are also found in the shape of the aedeagus, which is narrow and rounded apically in D. gigantea and D. marginalis Maia but truncated and notched in D. myrciariae Maia (Maia 1995).…”
Section: General Taxonomic Commentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Differences are also found in the shape of the aedeagus, which is narrow and rounded apically in D. gigantea and D. marginalis Maia but truncated and notched in D. myrciariae Maia (Maia 1995). Good differences are found in the shape of the pupal antennal bases, which are barely developed in D. strobila, bear tiny pointed projections in D. myrciariae, D. tavaresi Maia (Maia 1995) and D. tomentosa, developed into small tapered horns in D. globosa Maia and D. marginalis (Maia 1995;Maia et al 2005), or form flat, slightly bi-lobed ridges in D. gigantea (Angelo and Maia 1999). The number of terminal papillae in the larvae also vary among species, being eight in D. myricariae and D. tavaresi, but six in D. gigantea, D. strobila and D. tomentosa.…”
Section: General Taxonomic Commentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cecidomyiids are challenging insect pests because of their ability to manipulate plant growth, resulting in galls and tumorous formations ( Maia et al 2005 ; Vitou et al 2008 ; Vijaykumar et al 2009 ; Hall et al 2012 ; Stuart et al 2012 ; Uechi et al 2017 ). Specifically, swede midge is difficult to control due to: 1) the short adult life span and concealed feeding of larvae ( Readshaw 1966 ; Hallett et al 2009a , Chen et al 2011 ); 2) multiple overlapping generations with irregular emergence phenotypes that are difficult to predict ( Hallett et al 2009b ); and 3) all developmental stages of susceptible Brassica hosts seem impacted by herbivory ( Hallett 2007 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%