2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762005000700015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for testing the host specificity of ectoparasites: give them the opportunity to choose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is consistent with the findings of Esbérard et al (2005), which indicate that the determination of host specificity of a parasite is a very complex issue involving anatomical, physiological, evolutionary and behavioural adaptations. Further studies should be carried out to assess spatial and temporal infestation preferences in different regions of the host body and at different times of the day (Bittencourt & Rocha 2002) and to increase our understanding of some of the complicating factors that determine host specificity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation is consistent with the findings of Esbérard et al (2005), which indicate that the determination of host specificity of a parasite is a very complex issue involving anatomical, physiological, evolutionary and behavioural adaptations. Further studies should be carried out to assess spatial and temporal infestation preferences in different regions of the host body and at different times of the day (Bittencourt & Rocha 2002) and to increase our understanding of some of the complicating factors that determine host specificity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Referências sem espécies identificadas Jar, Par, VDR; RBPS Hatano (2000); Vecchi (1999Vecchi ( , 2007; Vrcibradic (2001); Marra (2002Marra ( , 2003; Rezende & Mazzoni (2003 Jar, Cax, VDR Bittencourt & Rocha (2002; Esberard et al(2005); Rocha et al (2008Rocha et al ( , 2009 Amblyopinus gahani Fauvel, 1901PVE Guitton et al (1986 Amblyopinodes sp. Jar, Cax, VDR Bittencourt & Rocha (2003); Esberard et al(2005;Rocha et al (2008, …”
Section: áRea De Ocorrênciaunclassified
“…Studies that analyze reinfestation can clarify this pattern of choice. In relation to bats, the studies by Esbérard et al (2005) and demonstrated the behavior of ectoparasites in laboratory experiments. Esbérard et al (2005) showed that the Streblidae species Megistopoda aranea (Coquillet, 1899), Megistopoda proxima (Séguy, 1926), and Strebla guajiro (Garcia & Casal, 1965) search for their hosts by species: Artibeus lituratus (Olfers, 1818), Sturnira lilium (E. Geoffroy, 1810) and Carollia perspicillata (Linnaeus, 1758), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to bats, the studies by Esbérard et al (2005) and demonstrated the behavior of ectoparasites in laboratory experiments. Esbérard et al (2005) showed that the Streblidae species Megistopoda aranea (Coquillet, 1899), Megistopoda proxima (Séguy, 1926), and Strebla guajiro (Garcia & Casal, 1965) search for their hosts by species: Artibeus lituratus (Olfers, 1818), Sturnira lilium (E. Geoffroy, 1810) and Carollia perspicillata (Linnaeus, 1758), respectively. analyzed the behavior of Trichobius joblingi Wenzel, 1966 regarding the choice of host and observed that these flies prefer individuals of C. perspicillata that do not present infestation by other individuals of T. joblingi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%