1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761999000700050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of knowledge on the etiological diagnosis of chagasic infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an examination of sera from children in the acute phase and in early chronic phase following treatment, other investigators reported similar declines in antibody recognition after several years of follow-up (1,33,44). Considering the high sensitivity and specificity of the CoML test in detecting lytic antibodies and the absence of significant difference between the positive percentage reduction tendencies of this test and the rCRP ELISA in the posttherapeutic patient evaluation, we conclude that the rCRP ELISA is an efficient and specific indicator of parasite clearance and suggest its use as a cure criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In an examination of sera from children in the acute phase and in early chronic phase following treatment, other investigators reported similar declines in antibody recognition after several years of follow-up (1,33,44). Considering the high sensitivity and specificity of the CoML test in detecting lytic antibodies and the absence of significant difference between the positive percentage reduction tendencies of this test and the rCRP ELISA in the posttherapeutic patient evaluation, we conclude that the rCRP ELISA is an efficient and specific indicator of parasite clearance and suggest its use as a cure criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…On the other hand, serology became negative after successful parasitological treatment of both acute and chronic infection, indicating cure from the infection (Luquetti 1999). A negative parasitological test alone does not represent treatment success; however, its positivity after chemotherapy represents therapeutic failure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by Luquetti (1999), improvements in diagnosis can be seen to have occurred during a number of key periods: during the first period, from discovery until 1960, diagnosis was performed using XD for parasitological research and using complement fixation reaction (CFR) for serological diagnosis of the chronic phase. During a second period, from [1960][1961][1962][1963][1964][1965][1966][1967][1968][1969][1970][1971][1972][1973][1974][1975], major progress was made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%