1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761998000600006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Evidence of Humans as Source of Leishmania viannia for Sandflies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Clinical response is considered to be the main indicator of the therapeutic response in New World cutaneous leishmaniasis because of the lack of concordance between the parasitological and clinical response to treatment in this trial and other studies in which viable parasites have been isolated from healed lesions. 14,15,18 The role of these parasites in the reactivation of lesions or metastasis 17 and as a source of infection in a putative anthroponotic cycle of the Leishmania Viannia 19 are issues that need to be elucidated through experiments to demonstrate the availability of the parasite in infected humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Clinical response is considered to be the main indicator of the therapeutic response in New World cutaneous leishmaniasis because of the lack of concordance between the parasitological and clinical response to treatment in this trial and other studies in which viable parasites have been isolated from healed lesions. 14,15,18 The role of these parasites in the reactivation of lesions or metastasis 17 and as a source of infection in a putative anthroponotic cycle of the Leishmania Viannia 19 are issues that need to be elucidated through experiments to demonstrate the availability of the parasite in infected humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasionally, there is evidence of L. (V.) braziliensis or L. (L.) amazonensis DNA in Lutzomyia longipalpis caught in the wild [ 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]—although these reports are not sufficient to incriminate this phlebotomine as a vector of leishmanine parasites. It is extremely relevant that the laboratory-bred sandfly vector can become experimentally infected after feeding on blood from the skin lesion edges of a patient with ACL caused by L. (V.) braziliensis [ 54 ]—reinforcing its potential as a vector for transmitting a Leishmania species other than L. (L.) infantum chagasi —which has never been definitively demonstrated under natural conditions. It, therefore, appears easier to accept that Lutzomyia longipalpis has developed a species-specific interaction with native L. (L.) infantum chagasi and its main wild reservoir (the crab-eating fox, Cerdocyon thous ) over thousands of years and represents an ecologically balanced enzootic cycle that is widely distributed in Latin America [ 3 , 4 , 37 , 55 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to demonstrating the permanence of Leishmania in the blood and tissues of healthy individuals, there is empirical evidence that humans can act as a reservoir due to the positivity to xenodiagnosis with sandflies on the lesion's edges (36,49,50). Epidemiological evidence suggests that a high proportion of infected individuals play an important role in L. (Viannia) species transmission, when associated with high population density and the anthropophilia of sandflies adapted to areas altered by human action in Brazil, Bolivia, and Peru (36,51).…”
Section: Humans and Domestic Animals As Possible Sources Of Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%