1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761998000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinfection in American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in the Hamster Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] It has long been postulated that infection of the host with one species of Leishmania might protect against re-infection with homologous or heterologous species. 22,23 However, in vitro studies of individual macrophage co-infections with different species of Leishmania suggest an absence of mutual exclusion if a second infection with a different strain occurs within a short window, 24 and recurrent infections in humans also imply some plasticity of this protective immune phenomenon. 25,26 The patient described in this report probably acquired the infection in the last leishmaniasisendemic region (Iberia), and although we cannot demonstrate definitively where this patient was infected, she was likely bitten by sand flies carrying different species over a short period in the same geographic location, thereby precluding development of any kind of partially protective immune response to infection by a second species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] It has long been postulated that infection of the host with one species of Leishmania might protect against re-infection with homologous or heterologous species. 22,23 However, in vitro studies of individual macrophage co-infections with different species of Leishmania suggest an absence of mutual exclusion if a second infection with a different strain occurs within a short window, 24 and recurrent infections in humans also imply some plasticity of this protective immune phenomenon. 25,26 The patient described in this report probably acquired the infection in the last leishmaniasisendemic region (Iberia), and although we cannot demonstrate definitively where this patient was infected, she was likely bitten by sand flies carrying different species over a short period in the same geographic location, thereby precluding development of any kind of partially protective immune response to infection by a second species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSORIO et al , (1998)11 pointed to the hamster model as an excellent tool for the study of leishmaniasis caused by parasites belonging to the subgenus Viannia due to it having shown susceptibility to these parasites and the similarity of the clinical symptoms to the ones presented in humans [in particular in relation to the presentation of chronic recurrent ulcers]. However in this study, no ulcerative lesions developed in juvenile hamsters by inoculation of 1 × 10 6 L. (V) panamensis promastigotes, while adult hamsters showed papules that contained parasites inside.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamsters are considered a suitable animal model for infection with Leishmania parasites of the subgenus Viannia (New World parasites) because of their special susceptibility to the infection with these species and because the chronic progression of the disease is similar to the one developed in humans that are naturally infected with Leishmania 3 11 12 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el presente estudio, el empleo de un modelo animal, en conjunto con una cepa e inóculo definido de Leishmania eliminó algunos factores de confusión como: 1) la respuesta inmune variable del hospedero, 2) el tiempo posinfección, 3) el sitio de la lesión (4,16,17) y la heterogeneidad en la infectividad/patogenicidad de Leishmania (18).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified