1992
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761992000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malaria seroepidemiology: comparison between indirect fluorescent antibody test and enzyme immunoassay using bloodspot eluates

Abstract: Blood sampling on filter paper is a current practice in malaria seroepidemiological studies by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). There is, however, scant comparative information about the use of bloodspot eluates for detection of malarial IgG antibodies simultaneously by IFAT and enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). Here we report data obtained by both serological methods done on 219 bloodspot eluate samples collected in a rural community in Brazilian Amazon Basin (Alto Paraíso, Ariquemes municipality) where m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Later studies using crude or recombinant antigens from P. falciparum and/or P. vivax have confirmed these findings in Africa [19][21], Asia [22],[23] and South America, including Brazil [12] [24][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Later studies using crude or recombinant antigens from P. falciparum and/or P. vivax have confirmed these findings in Africa [19][21], Asia [22],[23] and South America, including Brazil [12] [24][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…15 Titers ³ 16 were considered positive, because this cut-off value resulted in the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (i.e., highest diagnostic efficiency) when 108 negative control sera, 45 P. falciparum -positive control sera, and 48 P. vivax -positive control sera were analyzed. 14 By applying this cut-off titer, our indirect fluorescent antibody test had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98% for anti-P. falciparum antibodies and a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 96% for anti-P. vivax antibodies (data from Carvalho and others 14 ). When comparing paired samples, we defined exposure to malaria between blood draws to have occurred if 1) IgG antibodies were undetectable (below the cut-off titer) in the first sample and detectable in the second sample, or 2) there was an increase of 4-fold greater IgG antibody titers between the first and second blood draw.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To infer the occurrence of malarial infections between cross-sectional surveys, we compared titers of IgG antibodies to P. falciparum and P. vivax, measured by indirect fluorescent antibody test, in paired samples collected from the same subjects during Travel 1 and Travel 2. The assay protocol is described in detail elsewhere, 14 with P. falciparum and P. vivax antigens prepared directly from the blood of infected subjects. 15 Titers ³ 16 were considered positive, because this cut-off value resulted in the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (i.e., highest diagnostic efficiency) when 108 negative control sera, 45 P. falciparum -positive control sera, and 48 P. vivax -positive control sera were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, determination of antimalarial antibodies by ELISA has been shown to be a potentially useful epidemiological tool [11, 12]. For example, antibodies to the circumsporozoite antigen have been associated with transmission intensity [10] and with cumulative (age related) exposure to infection in both Brazil [13] and Sri Lanka [14]. In addition, serological data are relatively simple to collect: blood processed or blood spots collected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%