1987
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761987000400018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of characterizing Leishmania from cutaneous lesions: a simple approach for isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with other ATL studies from Brazil [4], [27], [28] and other tropical countries. In fact, in Minas Gerais State, government records show the majority of cases to be LCL (95%) followed by MCL (3%) [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are consistent with other ATL studies from Brazil [4], [27], [28] and other tropical countries. In fact, in Minas Gerais State, government records show the majority of cases to be LCL (95%) followed by MCL (3%) [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, this is not always possible, since L.(V.) braziliensis grows poorly in culture media, infects experimental animals with difficulty and appears in small numbers in smears and histological sections obtained from the lesions (Marsden 1986, Barral et al 1987. Because it is difficult to find parasites in active lesions (Marsden 1986), indirect ATL diagnosis is based on epidemiological evidence as well as clinical aspects, MST, serology and histopathological examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of prospective studies to assure sensitivity of culture for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis frequently involve patients with infections due to diverse species, disease acquired at different geographic regions and a wide variety of clinical forms (Weigle et al 1987, Barral et al 1987. Problems arise when these results are used to guide diagnostic interventions in areas with transmission of other species and different clinical presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%