1987
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761987000200010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second contribution to the knowledge of the larvae of the Raviniini (Diptera, Sarcophagidae) based on observations using scanning electron microscope

Abstract: First and second instar larvae of some Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of the tribe Raviniini are described on observations with a scanning electron microscope.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…argyrostoma do not match the pictures of Draber‐Monko et al () and Awad et al (). However, until further studies show whether or not the sculpturing is taxonomically useful, we agree with Leite and Lopes () that the shape of the teeth is more likely related to a supraspecific differentiation than a species‐specific separation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…argyrostoma do not match the pictures of Draber‐Monko et al () and Awad et al (). However, until further studies show whether or not the sculpturing is taxonomically useful, we agree with Leite and Lopes () that the shape of the teeth is more likely related to a supraspecific differentiation than a species‐specific separation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…At least the anterior and posterior spiracles and the cephalopharyngeal skeleton are described, drawn, or pictured for the third instar larvae of practically all species available in the literature. As regarding SEM descriptions, the sarcophagids have been barely and unevenly studied: the first instar larvae of about 70 European Miltogramminae species is known (Szpila, ; Szpila and Pape, , 2007, ); among the Paramachronychiinae, all the larval stages of Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Schiner, 1862) and first instar larvae of Sarcophila latifrons (Fallén, 1817) are known (Ruíz‐Martínez et al, ; Szpila, ); and from Sarcophaginae, the best studied genus is Sarcophaga , although several non‐Palaeartic species belonging to other genera have also been described (Leite and Lopes, ; Lopes and Leite, ; Mendoça et al, ). With regards to Sarcophaga , three species have been partially described (Aspoas, ), four species have descriptions of third instar larva stage alone (Kirk‐Spriggs, ; Pérez‐Moreno et al, ), and all the immature stages have been described for three more species (Awad et al, ; Draber‐Monko et al, ; Singh et al, ; Sukontason et al, , 2006; Suwannayod et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diversity can be understood from the morphological differences in mouthparts of many immature sarcophagids. The bladelike lateral edges of mouth hooks in the first instar P. ruficornis differ markedly from other sarcophagids such as Oxysarcodexia confuse, Oxysarcodexia thornax, Chaetoravinia almeidai whose mouth hooks bear small, sharp teeth Leite and Lopes 1987). Ravinia belforti also shows a mouth hook with delicate pits and ridges .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…and Ravinia spp. Leite and Lopes 1987). Thus, the pseudocephalon may sometimes be used for generic classification (Lopes 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%