1984
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761984000300014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of the type-material of creptotrema creptotrema travassos, Artigas & Pereira, 1928 (Digenea, Allocreadiidae)

Abstract: Creptotrema creptotrema Travassos, Artigas & Pereira, 1928, a digenetic trematode parasite of Leporinus elongatus, is redescribed from the type-material with additional morphological data and original figures.
Creptotrema creptotrema Travassos, Artigas & Pereira, 1928, trematódeo digenético parasito de Leporinus elongatus, é redescrito do material tipo com novos dados morfológicos e figuras originais

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This structure presents as ventral anterior discrete horseshoe-shaped flaps and a discrete single ventrolateral muscular lobe on either side of the oral sucker, stretching from the ventral side to the lateral area, but not extending to the dorsal region, without free dorsal ends. The presence of a tegument, papillous or rugose, on the suckers described by Kohn [ 29 ] was not observed in our light microscopy and SEM analyses.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This structure presents as ventral anterior discrete horseshoe-shaped flaps and a discrete single ventrolateral muscular lobe on either side of the oral sucker, stretching from the ventral side to the lateral area, but not extending to the dorsal region, without free dorsal ends. The presence of a tegument, papillous or rugose, on the suckers described by Kohn [ 29 ] was not observed in our light microscopy and SEM analyses.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Remarks: The original description of C. creptotrema [ 68 ] was revised by Kohn [ 29 ] to resolve inconsistencies about morphological features such as the absence of spines in the tegument (originally described as spinous), and to provide a consistent description of the cirrus sac (absent in the original description). The redescription provided by Kohn [ 29 ] was made based on the same specimens analyzed by Travassos et al [ 68 ], deposited at the Helminthological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute (CHIOC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Os únicos registros de C. creptotrema foram realizados em Leporinus elongatus de localidade brasileira não especificada 1 e em P. maculatus do Estuário de Guaiba, RS 20 . O tegumento da região das ventosas pode apresentar papilas ou aspecto rugoso, o que teria levado os autores do táxon nominal a confundir essas estruturas com espinhos por ocasião de sua descrição original 21 . Foram observadas papilas na região das ventosas e ausência de espinhos no tegumento dos espécimes de C. creptotrema encontrados em P. maculatus.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…In addition, the oral sucker and ventral sucker are nearly equal in size (width ratio=1:0.9-1.1), whereas the oral sucker is always smaller than the ventral sucker in C. creptotrema Travassos, Artigas and Pereira, 1928, C. funduli, C. lynchi Brooks, 1976, C. pati Lunaschi, 1985, and C. agonostomi Salgado-Maldonado, Cabañas-Carranza, and Caspeta-Mandujano, 1998, and always larger than the ventral sucker in C. paraensis Vicente, dos Santos, and de Souza, 1978. Creptotrema lamothei differs further from C. creptotrema by having a body nearly twice as large, measuring 1 150-1 405 long by 359-457 μm wide compared with 466-622 long by 240-390 μm wide, and by having slightly smaller eggs, measuring 51-62 long by 31-34 μm wide compared with 60-78 long by 38-50 μm wide (Travassos et al, 1928;Kohn, 1984). The cirrus sac is arcuate in both C. lamothei and C. creptotrema but extends only to the posterior margin of the ventral sucker in the former and slightly posterior to the ventral sucker in the latter.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%