1965
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761965000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribuição ao conhecimento da tribu Ormiini. III: gênero Euphasiopteryx Townsend, 1915 (Diptera, Tachinidae)

Abstract: This is a contribution to the knowledge of the Tribu Ormiini in wich the author presents redescriptions of euphasiopteryx depleta (Wiedemann, 1830), Euphasiopteryx ochracea (Bigot, 1888) and describes a new species: Euphasiopteryx rosenoi sp. n. from Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As taxonomic characters of the genus Euphasiopteryx are largely restricted to males (Sabrosky, 1953 ;Tavares, 1965), but as large numbers of Euphasiopteryx females can be attracted to broadcast calls of male mole crickets (Fowler, 1987a), and since little is known of phonotactic polymorphism, studies of fly development in different species of Scapteriscus and Anurogryllus were referenced to the sound source of female capture. This paper presents the results of this study to quantify the differential survival and development of E. depleta on these crickets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As taxonomic characters of the genus Euphasiopteryx are largely restricted to males (Sabrosky, 1953 ;Tavares, 1965), but as large numbers of Euphasiopteryx females can be attracted to broadcast calls of male mole crickets (Fowler, 1987a), and since little is known of phonotactic polymorphism, studies of fly development in different species of Scapteriscus and Anurogryllus were referenced to the sound source of female capture. This paper presents the results of this study to quantify the differential survival and development of E. depleta on these crickets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No entanto, Townsend tratou os dois gêneros como distintos e válidos (Townsend 1936(Townsend , 1938, o que foi seguido, apesar de alguns questionamentos, por Sabrosky (Sabrosky 1953). Posteriormente, Tavares, em sua série de estudos de Ormiini, também reconheceu a validade de Ormiophasia (Tavares 1964(Tavares , 1965, inclusive com diagnoses baseadas em caracteres da terminália masculina. Enfim, Guimarães (Guimarães 1971) manteve Ormiophasia como válido em seu catálogo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified