1917
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761917000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O microplancton do Atlantico nas imediações de Mar del Plata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This clearly contradicts the current lorica-based classification, in which the genus is placed together with Membranicola and Tintinnidium in the Tintinnidiidae based on their (supposedly) soft and often sparsely agglutinated loricae; such loricae were assumed to represent the plesiomorphic character state typical for most freshwater tintinnids. However, the original description by Imhof (1886) and the redescriptions (Jiang et al 2012; Laackmann 1913) of Tintinnopsis radix as well as the original description of Stylicauda platensis by da Cunha and da Fonseca (1917; reported as Tintinnopsis platensis ) also mention a sparse agglutination of particles, but not a softness of the loricae; and actually, the loricae of the sequenced Leprotintinnus specimens were not investigated for their rigidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clearly contradicts the current lorica-based classification, in which the genus is placed together with Membranicola and Tintinnidium in the Tintinnidiidae based on their (supposedly) soft and often sparsely agglutinated loricae; such loricae were assumed to represent the plesiomorphic character state typical for most freshwater tintinnids. However, the original description by Imhof (1886) and the redescriptions (Jiang et al 2012; Laackmann 1913) of Tintinnopsis radix as well as the original description of Stylicauda platensis by da Cunha and da Fonseca (1917; reported as Tintinnopsis platensis ) also mention a sparse agglutination of particles, but not a softness of the loricae; and actually, the loricae of the sequenced Leprotintinnus specimens were not investigated for their rigidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comentários: a presença de colar tem sido motivo de discussão. Balech (1962) informa que ele sempre ocorreu em seus exemplares, embora Kofoid & Campbell (1939) Cunha & Fonseca, 1917:141 $O\.1to, 1970a Descrição: lórica aglutinante cilíndrica, tornando-se cônica na região abora!. Região oral lisa e irregular; região aboral de lados convergentes e convexos, formando uma extremidade aboral obtusa ou acuminada, encimada por um apêndice caudal hia.linoafilÇl,do, cônico e agudo.…”
Section: Q-230llm;unclassified
“…In the future, with a more comprehensive knowledge about tintinnid morphology, specifically cell features, these monophyletic clades will receive a systematic rank. Therefore, the genera Rhizodomus and Stylicauda are maintained here and in Agatha and Str€ uder-Kypke (2013), although some authors discuss synonymisation with the genus Tintinnopsis (da Cunha and da Fonseca 1917;Laval-Peuto 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%