Pesquisadores do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico na área de Cardiologia

Oliveira, Eduardo A.; Ribeiro, Antônio Luiz Pinho; Quirino, Isabel Gomes; Oliveira, M. C.; Martelli, Daniella Reis Barbosa; Lima, Leonardo Santos; Colosimo, Enrico A.; Lopes, Thais Junqueira; Silva, Ana Cristina Simões; Martelli‐Júnior, Hercílio

doi:10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000086

Cited by 19 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This fact was also noted in other areas of Health Sciences, such as Dentistry, Public Health and Physiotherapy 8,9,11,12 as well as other fields of Clinical Medicine. 19,20 This increase relates to the current positive cycle of Brazilian scientific production and possibly reflects several factors, such as the increase in the federal budget for science and technology, and the various incentive mechanisms established by numerous development agencies in the country. 4,[21][22][23] For example, the federal budget for science and technology, although still relatively low when compared to developed countries, rose from 1.26 to 1.43% of the Brazilian gross domestic product in 2008.…”

Section: Impact Of the Scientific Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Profile and scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Hematology/Oncology

Oliveira

Martelli

Quirino

et al. 2014

Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflict of interest: noneObjective: several studies have examined the academic production of the researchers at the CNPq, in several areas of knowledge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scientific production of researchers in Hematology/Oncology who hold scientific productivity grants from the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development. Methods: the Academic CVs of 28 researchers in Hematology/Oncology with active grants in the three-year period from 2006 to 2008 were included in the analysis. The variables of interest were: institution, researchers' time after doctorate, tutoring of undergraduate students, masters and PhD degree, scientific production and its impact. Results: from a total of 411 researchers in Medicine, 28 (7%) were identified as being in the area of Hematology/Oncology. There was a slight predominance of males (53.6%) and grant holders in category 1. Three Brazilian states are responsible for approximately 90% of the researchers: São Paulo (21,75%), Rio de Janeiro (3,11%), and Minas Gerais (2, 7%). During their academic careers, the researchers published 2,655 articles, with a median of 87 articles per researcher (IQR = 52 to 122). 65 and 78% of this total were indexed on the Web of Science and Scopus databases, respectively. The researchers received 14,247 citations on the WoS database with a median of 385 citations per researcher. The average number of citations per article was 8.2. Conclusion: in this investigation, it was noted that researchers in the field of Hematology/Oncology have a relevant scientific output from the point of view of quantity and quality compared to other medical specialties.

show abstract

Section: Impact Of the Scientific Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Profile and scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Hematology/Oncology

Oliveira

Martelli

Quirino

et al. 2014

Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A cross-sectional study was done, based on previous studies which evaluated the profile and the scientific productivity of the researchers who had a PQ grant in the following medical fields: Cardiology 12 These five studies took into consideration the knowledge areas through the analyses of the resume Lattes of the researcher, available on the CNPq Lattes platform. In the case of not having this information clearly specified, we analyzed the scientific production of the last five years, been allocated to a knowledge area with greater predominance in the published and/or advised topics [12][13][14][15][16] .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the case of not having this information clearly specified, we analyzed the scientific production of the last five years, been allocated to a knowledge area with greater predominance in the published and/or advised topics [12][13][14][15][16] .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Starting from the five years of studies mentioned [12][13][14][15][16] , a data bank was built to enable the comparison between the medical fields, holding the following information: gender (male or female), grant category (2, 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D), researchers' home institution (geopolitical region, federation unit and by academic institution), time of the doctors degree conclusion, institution of the doctors degree, human resources training and scientific production (scientific articles).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Medicine, some studies evaluated the profile of the scientific production of researchers in this area 8,[12][13][14][15][16] . However, the data are still scarce and they need better understating.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Avaliação da Produção Científica em Áreas da Medicina: um Estudo Comparativo

Sales

Martelli

Oliveira

et al. 2017

Rev. bras. educ. med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison of Brazilian researchers in clinical medicine: are criteria for ranking well-adjusted?

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quantifying the relative performance of individual scholars has become an integral part of decision-making in research policy. The objective of the present study was to evaluate if the scholarship rank of Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in Medicine is consistent with their scientific productivity. The Lattes curricula of 411 researchers (2006)(2007)(2008) were included in the study. Scholarship category was the variable of interest. Other variables analyzed were: time since receiving the doctorate, teaching activity (undergraduate, master's and doctoral students), number of articles published, and number of papers indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and Scopus databases. Additional performance indicators included were: citations, h-index, and m-index. There was a significant difference among scholarship categories regarding number of papers per year, considering the entire scientific career (P \ 0.001) or the last 5 years (P \ 0.001). There was no significant difference among scholarship categories regarding the number of citations per article in the ISI (Thomson Reuters) database (P = 0.23). There was a significant difference in h-index among scholarship categories in both databases, i.e. (P \ 0.001) and Scopus (P \ 0.001). Regarding the m-index, there was a significant difference among categories only in the ISI database (P = 0.012). According to our findings, a better instrument for qualitative and quantitative indicators is needed to identify researchers with outstanding scientific output.

show abstract

Pesquisadores do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico na área de Cardiologia

Abstract: Our study has shown that researchers in the field of cardiology have a relevant scientific production. The knowledge of the profile of researchers in the field of Cardiology will probably enable effective strategies to qualitatively improve the scientific output of Brazilian researchers.

Cited by 19 publications

References 22 publications

Profile and scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Hematology/Oncology

Profile and scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Hematology/Oncology

Avaliação da Produção Científica em Áreas da Medicina: um Estudo Comparativo

Comparison of Brazilian researchers in clinical medicine: are criteria for ranking well-adjusted?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About