2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2004001400003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantificação da massa infartada do ventrículo esquerdo pela ressonância magnética cardíaca: comparação entre a planimetria e o método de escore visual semi-quantitativo

Abstract: In patients with previous myocardial infarction, delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate infarct size quantification by planimetry and by semiquantitative score.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMI type, regarding transmurality, was thus classified into three categories: transmural (TM), non‑transmural (NTM), and mixed (when both AMI types were present). The percentage of infarcted LV mass was calculated using the semi-quantitative visual score method, as described elsewhere 17 . The AMI transmurality index (TI) was obtained by calculating the ratio between the number of segments with transmural infarction (SegTM AMI) and the total number of segments with AMI (NSegAMI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMI type, regarding transmurality, was thus classified into three categories: transmural (TM), non‑transmural (NTM), and mixed (when both AMI types were present). The percentage of infarcted LV mass was calculated using the semi-quantitative visual score method, as described elsewhere 17 . The AMI transmurality index (TI) was obtained by calculating the ratio between the number of segments with transmural infarction (SegTM AMI) and the total number of segments with AMI (NSegAMI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of points is obtained by the addition of the points divided by 144 (maximum score) and multiplied by 100. The accepted margin of error is ± 4 (± 2.7%) 13 . The amount of fibrosis was divided and classified in thirds: (I, small: 0% to 25%; II, moderate: 25% to 41%; III, large: 42% to 56%).…”
Section: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%