1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x1999000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological and statistical topics in randomized controlled clinical trials

Abstract: Methodological and Statistical Topics in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials Lecture Escosteguy CC Methodology of randomized clinical trials Arq Bras Cardiol volume 72, (nº 2), 1999 volume 72, (nº 2), 1999 Escosteguy CC Methodology of randomized clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Escosteguy (1999), studies with a randomized design are the best source of scientific evidence available and the best source for determining an intervention's efficacy. As such, they are considered the gold standard of scientific research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Escosteguy (1999), studies with a randomized design are the best source of scientific evidence available and the best source for determining an intervention's efficacy. As such, they are considered the gold standard of scientific research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, even though the descriptor “randomized controlled trials” was used in the search strategy, we decided to include articles with other designs in order to include a greater number of publications, as this is a recent subject and publications in the field are scarce. To build the results, only studies with a randomized controlled design were evaluated for their quality (Escosteguy, 1999). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic reviews, to be effective, must include only randomized controlled studies, which are high-quality evidence. 23 Exclusion criteria were: studies that did not show any clear methodological definition and those whose main outcome was not focused on the smell or taste of the subjects.…”
Section: Review Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…O estudo tratou-se de um ensaio clínico controlado. Este tipo de estudo verifica o efeito de determinada intervenção em um grupo experimental, geralmente terapêutica, quando comparada a controles (ESCOSTEGUY, 1999). O projeto foi avaliado e aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética do ISECENSA, com parecer consubstanciado nº 3.464.436, e registro na plataforma brasileira de registro de Ensaios Clínicos (Re-BEC) com nº UTN: U1111-1249-0494.…”
Section: Métodounclassified