2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0041-87812001000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain evaluation of patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare pain as reported by outpatients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain, in view of designing more adequate physical therapy treatment.Patients and Methods: A Portuguese version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire -where subjects are asked to choose, from lists of pre-categorized words, one or none that best describes what they feel -was used to assess pain intensity and quality of 64 patients, of which 24 had fibromyalgia, 22 had osteoarthritis, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Those with chronic pain present mechanical and often-behavioral changes that facilitate the perpetuation of pain due to associated affective difficulties (29). In our study, the main dimension observed was sensory, when compared with the affective dimension seen by Marques et al (26). Nevertheless, emotional factors such as work-related stress are risk factors for chronic neck pain, and the interference of pain in these aspects can be inferred by the words chosen in the affective category (30).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Those with chronic pain present mechanical and often-behavioral changes that facilitate the perpetuation of pain due to associated affective difficulties (29). In our study, the main dimension observed was sensory, when compared with the affective dimension seen by Marques et al (26). Nevertheless, emotional factors such as work-related stress are risk factors for chronic neck pain, and the interference of pain in these aspects can be inferred by the words chosen in the affective category (30).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Rather than focus only on the quality or intensity of symptoms, as is assessed in many pain measures (45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51), participants also emphasized the frequency, duration, and unpredictability of pain because these dimensions were tied to decisions about whether to perform activities. Moreover, relevant to future research and clinical assessment was that there was no consistent experience of OA pain quality, a finding similar to other studies (47,48). OA participants of all ages reported a vast range of pain descriptors not linked to the location of their disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, adding pompage to therapy with stretching exercises and AE for 12 weeks improved only one of the pain aspects evaluated by the McGill Questionnaire (mixed aspects of pain) and for PRI no significant difference was found. The easy understanding of the words of mixed aspects may have collaborated to this, while the lack of familiarity with the words of the other aspects of the questionnaire may have made difficult choosing the most appropriate word, compromising evaluation 20 . AE beneficial effects on pain and FM are already well described in the literature 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%