2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46652012000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancies and consequences of indirect hemagglutination, indirect immunofluorescence and Elisa tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease

Abstract: SUMMARYUsing the indirect hemagglutination (IH), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease, 4000 serum samples were examined. This study was conducted with different purposes: clinical interest, research support and parasitological monitoring of those patients with Chagas disease who were treated with heart transplantations. The tests occurred without patient selection and in accordance with the medical requests. The results showed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is contrary to most studies, which show a relatively good concordance among tests, and only a 1–2 % of inconclusive results [ 18 , 19 ]. However, a study in Brazil also reported a high discordance among hemaglutination, immunofluorescence and ELISA tests [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is contrary to most studies, which show a relatively good concordance among tests, and only a 1–2 % of inconclusive results [ 18 , 19 ]. However, a study in Brazil also reported a high discordance among hemaglutination, immunofluorescence and ELISA tests [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies were attributable to the type of parasite antigen; IIF detects a specific antibody that reacts with a parasite membrane antigen, whereas HI detects an antibody that reacts with a subcellular antigen. Each of these serological reactions operates in different specificity systems [70]. Another study in Spain was found to have a higher sensitivity (97-100%), and for serological screening of T. cruzi infection, a combination of tests is needed [71].…”
Section: The World Of Diagnosis For Chagas Disease: a Discordant Paramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, T. cruzi diagnostic present problems of sensitivity, making the diagnosis confusing and often requiring additional testing [40,70,71]. In congenital cases, it has been observed that discordance between the samples analyzed also occurs, and discordant results were confirmed by a third diagnostic test [72].…”
Section: The World Of Diagnosis For Chagas Disease: a Discordant Paramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For diagnosis in chronic phase, either asymptomatic or symptomatic phases, several immunological techniques have been developed for the detection of specific IgG antibodies against epimastigotes extracts of T. cruzi, including the Indirect Immuno fluorescence (IF), the Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay (ELISA) and Indirect Hemagglutination (IH). 8,[39][40][41][42] The majority of immunological tests commercially available use recombinant antigens, synthetic peptides and antigens obtained from non-native strains antigenically different from local strains, which generates low specificity and sensitivity in the tests. 40,43 Since no single standard reference test is available yet, diagnosis should base on the presence of IgG against various T. cruzi antigens by using at least two serological assays with different antigens.…”
Section: Serological Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%