2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0031-10492008002700001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of Euprognatha Stimpson, 1871 (Crustacea, Brachyura, Inachoididae) from off coast of northeastern Brazil

Abstract: A new species of Euprognatha Stimpson, 1871 from off coast of Brazil (Canopus Bank, 02º15.3'00"S - 38º16.0'00"W) is described and illustrated, namely Euprognatha limatula n. sp. The new species is compared to its congeners. Lectotypes are designated for E. acuta A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 and E. granulata Faxon, 1893. A key to the species of Euprognatha is provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And yet, Guinot and Van Bakel (2020a) expressed the opinion that the intestinal spine in E. ricei may actually be a pleonal spine. Euprognatha (e.g., E. rastellifera and E. limatula Santana and Tavares, 2008;Fig. 4.5, 4.6) further differs from Willinachoides n. gen. in having a prominent spine on the mesobranchial and intestinal regions in some of its species, both of such spines absent in Willinachoides n. gen., and in the absence of a distinct tubercle in the furrow that delimits the cardiac region laterally (present in E. ricei).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And yet, Guinot and Van Bakel (2020a) expressed the opinion that the intestinal spine in E. ricei may actually be a pleonal spine. Euprognatha (e.g., E. rastellifera and E. limatula Santana and Tavares, 2008;Fig. 4.5, 4.6) further differs from Willinachoides n. gen. in having a prominent spine on the mesobranchial and intestinal regions in some of its species, both of such spines absent in Willinachoides n. gen., and in the absence of a distinct tubercle in the furrow that delimits the cardiac region laterally (present in E. ricei).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…
Figure 4.Recent Inachoididae. ( 1 ) Inachoides lambriformis (De Haan, 1839), male, cl 15.4 mm, cw 12.0 mm (MCZ 1837); ( 2 ) Paradasygyius depressus (Bell, 1835), male, cl 26 mm, cw 21.2 mm (MZUSP 19261); ( 3 ) Paulita tuberculata (Lemos de Castro, 1949), cl 19 mm, cw 17.2 mm (MZUSP 22543); ( 4 ) Collodes granosus Stimpson, 1860, ovigerous female, cl 9.8 mm, cw 8.6 mm (USNM 55766); ( 5 ) Euprognatha rastellifera Rathbun, 1894, male holotype, cl 9.9 mm, cw 7.4 mm (USNM 18108); ( 6 ) Euprognatha limatula Santana and Tavares, 2008, male holotype, cl 8.5 mm, cw 7.0 mm (MZUSP 16940). V–VIII, fifth to eighth thoracic pleurites.
…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of several unique characters in Paradasygyius, also found in a number of American genera originally assigned to Inachinae MacLeay, 1838, had led to the grouping of these American genera in a same taxon, the Inachoididae Dana, 1851, rehabilitated by Drach & Guinot (1982: 715-720;1983: 37-42) and Guinot (1984: 378-381). The Inachoididae was listed with 10 genera by Ng et al (2008: 115) and Ahyong et al (2011: 187 Garth, 1958;Pyromaia Stimpson, 1871. The more obvious inachoidid character, that is the dorsal exposure of pleurites 5-8 and of the first abdominal somite (the first at least or more; see below), often pointed or ending in a spine, is clearly shown in the figures by Melo (1996, as Inachoidinae) and Hendrickx (1999) for several inachoidid taxa, by Lemaitre et al (2001) for Pyromaia, and by Santana & Tavares (2008) for Euprognatha Stimpson, 1871. The result of the exposure of pleurites 5-8 is the insertion of the carapace into a setting gutter, marking the separation between the covered internal portion of the pleurites and their uncovered latero-external portion, which is calcified and ornamented like the carapace.…”
Section: Remarks On the Inachoididae Dana 1851mentioning
confidence: 97%