2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0031-10492005000800001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The philosophy of total evidence and its relevance for phylogenetic inference

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, based on the comparison of the poly morphism of intronic sequences of the ATP synthase α subunit gene, the previously published nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial genes, and the morpho logical descriptions of respective species, the first attempt to construct a phylogenetic tree of Baicaliidae combining all the traits was made, which was based on a single Bayesian approach (Rieppel, 2005;Ronquist et al, 2012).…”
Section: Genetic and Morphologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, based on the comparison of the poly morphism of intronic sequences of the ATP synthase α subunit gene, the previously published nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial genes, and the morpho logical descriptions of respective species, the first attempt to construct a phylogenetic tree of Baicaliidae combining all the traits was made, which was based on a single Bayesian approach (Rieppel, 2005;Ronquist et al, 2012).…”
Section: Genetic and Morphologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasingly algorithmic approach to characters has become predominant in the analysis of morphological characters as well, under the paradigm of a total evidence approach that combines all available character data without critical evaluation of homology hypotheses. Indeed, the congruence of characters (coherence of character statements: Rieppel 2004) relative to a hierarchy has become accepted as the sole arbiter of homology vs. non-homology (homoplasy) by many contemporary systematists, irrespective of the nature of the data (Rieppel 2005a). In an effort to avoid theory-ladenness of character statements, systematics has moved towards an operationalist approach to character delineation (Kearney, in press), where theoretical input into the process of character conceptualization is rejected in favor of an appeal to mere congruence in the evaluation of whatever character hypothesis is being proposed (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new species was recovered in MP and ML nuclear trees as the sister taxon of T. cocorobensis, but placed as sister of the clade formed by (T. cocorobensis (T. catalanensis ((T. cocorobensis ((T. torquatus + T. imbituba) (T. catalanensis (T. chromatops + T. etheridgei)))) in MP and ML mitochondrial analyses. Total evidence and topological conflict: Inasmuch as separate analyses were useful for understanding differences and inferring the sources of topological conflict (Nixon and Carpenter, 1996;Peloso et al, 2015; but see Kluge, 2003, andFitzhugh, 2006, for a critique on this kind of data exploration), we favored the phylogenetic hypotheses based on the analyses of our concatenated data set following the principle of character congruence or total evidence (Carnap, 1950, who credited much earlier workers; subsequently championed by others including Kluge, 1989;Rieppel, 2005, andFitzhugh, 2006). The ML total evidence tree was preferred as the best hypothesis representing the phylogenetic relationships of tropidurines ( fig.…”
Section: Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%