2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0011-52582009000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinantes do comportamento particularista de legisladores estaduais brasileiros

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…City councilors in Brazil are the lowest-level representatives and are the closest politicians to the population. However, the literature presents them as very inefficient and clientelistic (Castro et al 2009;Lopez and Almeida 2017b;Leal 2012). Thus, the mechanism that takes us from council size to welfare requires further clarification.…”
Section: From Council Size To Welfare: Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…City councilors in Brazil are the lowest-level representatives and are the closest politicians to the population. However, the literature presents them as very inefficient and clientelistic (Castro et al 2009;Lopez and Almeida 2017b;Leal 2012). Thus, the mechanism that takes us from council size to welfare requires further clarification.…”
Section: From Council Size To Welfare: Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desse modo, não se pretendeu fazer inferências para o conjunto total de socioeducandos em Minas Gerais no ano de 2009, mas sim verificar em que medida os dados disponíveis contribuem para problematizar esse contexto a partir de proposições teóricas anteriormente analisadas. Outros estudos apontam para a possibilidade de se trabalhar com amostras não aleatóri-as e para a potencialidade de análises que não se pautem somente no objetivo de fazer inferências para o total de uma dada população (Castro;Anastasia;Nunes, 2009;Schrodt, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Thus, the preferences of individual legislators will reflect the ideology shared by the group that constitutes their party, either locally or nationally. As several papers have shown, ideology is still a key distinguisher of politicians in Brazil (Castro et al 2009;Power and Zucco Jr. 2009), although ideology's influence on roll call votes has diminished over time (Zucco Jr. 2009). Thus, it is reasonable to believe that ideology is still a good proxy for what legislators wish for.…”
Section: Institutions Resources and Governabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deputies of the two largest states in Brazil, São Paulo (SP) and Minas Gerais (MG), believe the governor's best strategy to obtain legislative support is to negotiate pork with party leaders. Legislators from highly competitive states (Castro et al 2009), such as Bahia (BA) and Rio Grande do Sul (RS), however, believe cabinet formation is the best strategy. In poor states like Ceará (CE) and Tocantins (TO), the negotiation of pork with individual legislators seems to be the most widely chosen option.…”
Section: The Dependent Variable: Strategy To Obtain Legislative Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%