2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2007000200034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial intrasellar kissing carotid arteries: case report

Abstract: Intracranial "kissing" carotid arteries are a rare variant of the carotid arteries, where both internal carotid arteries deviate medially and touch each other near the midline within the sphenoid sinus or the sphenoid bone, including the sella. This anomaly is particularly important since it may cause or mimic pituitary disease and also may complicate transsphenoidal surgery. We report a rare case of intracranial intrasellar kissing carotid arteries in a 57-years-old woman that was submitted to a computed tomo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,9,10 Furthermore, “kissing” carotid arteries have been reported rarely to occur, and require additional consideration prior to selecting a transsphenoidal approach for sellar or suprasellar lesions. 8,9 In this series, the narrowest distance between parasellar ICAs noted in a patient undergoing transsphenoidal surgery was 9.1 mm, and splaying of the ICAs was noted in patients with sellar lesions compared with normal subjects. This gradual splaying was also pronounced when comparing patients with larger (≥ 10 mm) versus smaller (< 10 mm) lesions (20.2 vs 16.8 mm, p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…4,9,10 Furthermore, “kissing” carotid arteries have been reported rarely to occur, and require additional consideration prior to selecting a transsphenoidal approach for sellar or suprasellar lesions. 8,9 In this series, the narrowest distance between parasellar ICAs noted in a patient undergoing transsphenoidal surgery was 9.1 mm, and splaying of the ICAs was noted in patients with sellar lesions compared with normal subjects. This gradual splaying was also pronounced when comparing patients with larger (≥ 10 mm) versus smaller (< 10 mm) lesions (20.2 vs 16.8 mm, p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The term “kissing carotids” describes elongated carotid arteries that touch at the midline, which is observed retropharyngeal or intrasphenoidal/intrasellar – Infraoptic origin of ACA : …”
Section: Classification Of Normal Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reporting of normal variants is very important for surgeons and interventional radiologists, as some of these variants have to be considered to avoid disastrous consequences during interventions. –Disastrous hemorrhage is a risk in the following cases: ○Transsphenoidal pituitary operations in cases with PTA or intrasellar kissing carotids ○Middle ear operation in cases of persistent stapedial artery and aberrant intratympanic ICA …”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 21 29 ] Among other relevant workup, standard preoperative planning of TSS includes review of the distinct anatomical characteristics of the individuals’ sellar and sphenoid region as well as the course of the internal carotid arteries. [ 4 28 ] Most often, physicians spend only seconds on the examination of printed MRI films to exclude the presence of “kissing” carotids; this coupled with any other eye-catching pathology on films, such as a pituitary macroadenoma, may draw the attention of radiologists away from subtle flow artifacts. Thus, there is some concern that an incidental aneurysm may be present within the sellar region and become the cause for catastrophic intraoperative complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 29 ] One of the preoperative considerations for TSS is an exclusion of “kissing internal carotid arteries: (ICA), a rare anatomical variant and absolute contraindication for TSS. [ 25 28 38 ] However, even in the absence of this vascular configuration, the rate of intraoperative arterial injuries remains significant. In different case series, it has been reported to be as high as 1.1%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%