1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000600028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbances of speech and language in subcortical lesions

Abstract: Interest in the function of subcortical structures in cognitive function has grown in the last decades. Such interest has increased after the advent of modern innovations in radiology techniques, which provide a better visualization of subcortical lesions, like computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cortical blood flow and metabolism studies also brought a better understanding of diaschisis mechanisms in vivo and improved our knowledge about the pathophysiology of subcortical lesion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They take into account the effects related to the modalities of stimuli input and answer output and also those task-specific, in order to control linguistic and non-linguistic variables. The Brazilian reference values to BDAE and Token Test were based on previous studies conducted by the authors 24,25 . An additional test of frontal scripts, translated into Portuguese from Allain's et al original publication 26 , was applied in four patients (two with left lesion and two with right lesion) and nine normal individuals, for comparison (normal subjects had an average of 2.6 ordination mistakes and no intrusions).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They take into account the effects related to the modalities of stimuli input and answer output and also those task-specific, in order to control linguistic and non-linguistic variables. The Brazilian reference values to BDAE and Token Test were based on previous studies conducted by the authors 24,25 . An additional test of frontal scripts, translated into Portuguese from Allain's et al original publication 26 , was applied in four patients (two with left lesion and two with right lesion) and nine normal individuals, for comparison (normal subjects had an average of 2.6 ordination mistakes and no intrusions).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%