1990
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x1990000200015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral aneurysms assessment of 377 cases (1956-1982)

Abstract: A review of 177 patients with cerebral aneurysms is made, out of whom 106 with ruptured aneurysms were examined, whose operational timing and prognostic chances were well documented (group B, 1979-1982) and in part updated to 1984. Furthermore, relevant data of a previous series of 200 cases of cerebral aneurysm, treated between 1956-1978 were used (group A). The patients were graded according to Hunt and Hess, assessing the risks involved. The percentages of recurrent bleeding were in group A 36.5% and 28% in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be attributed to technical difficulties of microdissection of the sylvian fissure or to an adverse aneurysm location. Microscopic dissection difficulties have been related by multiple logistic regression to thick arachnoid membrane and severe adherence between the frontal and the temporal operculae and, albeit increasing the surgical time, these factors are not directly related to any clinical consequence [32][33][34][35][36] . By consequence, the most important anatomical factor to predict an adverse outcome is an unfavorable location of the intracranial aneurysm and this should guide the pre-operative planning.…”
Section: Gosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be attributed to technical difficulties of microdissection of the sylvian fissure or to an adverse aneurysm location. Microscopic dissection difficulties have been related by multiple logistic regression to thick arachnoid membrane and severe adherence between the frontal and the temporal operculae and, albeit increasing the surgical time, these factors are not directly related to any clinical consequence [32][33][34][35][36] . By consequence, the most important anatomical factor to predict an adverse outcome is an unfavorable location of the intracranial aneurysm and this should guide the pre-operative planning.…”
Section: Gosmentioning
confidence: 99%