2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27302002000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relação da homocisteinemia com a sensibilidade à insulina e com fatores de risco cardiovascular em um grupo indígena brasileiro

Abstract: RESUMOA hiper-homocisteinemia é um fator de risco cardiovascular independente. Há controvérsias sobre uma possível relação entre a homocisteína e a resistência/sensibilidade à insulina. Para testar a relação entre a homocisteinemia e a sensibilidade à insulina, noventa índios Parkatêjê (90% da população adulta, sem miscigenação) tiveram os níveis séricos de homocisteína total (HPLC) dosados. A sensibilidade à insulina (%S) foi calculada pelo HOMA. Uma índia diabética foi excluída das análises envolvendo glicem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to mention that three articles (18,24,26) presented a different number of participants in the sample from those who had their blood pressure measured and presented in the results. Almost all the studies (21) were performed with both genders, except for one study (11) that investigated only men and another (31) that investigated only indigenous women.…”
Section: Overview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to mention that three articles (18,24,26) presented a different number of participants in the sample from those who had their blood pressure measured and presented in the results. Almost all the studies (21) were performed with both genders, except for one study (11) that investigated only men and another (31) that investigated only indigenous women.…”
Section: Overview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that one study (30) established the largest cutoff as higher than or equal to 130/85 mmHg, and one study (10) showed no diagnostic criteria. It is also noteworthy that in seven studies (11,23,(26)(27)(28)30,33) , the presence of previous diagnosis of hypertension and/or treatment with antihypertensive medication were considered in addition to blood pressure levels. (20) .…”
Section: Overview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations