2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652013000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributional patterns of herbivore megamammals during the Late Pleistocene of South America

Abstract: The geographic distribution of 27 species of the South American megafauna of herbivore mammals during the Late Pleistocene was analyzed in order to identify their distributional patterns. The distribution of the species was studied using the panbiogeographical method of track analysis. Six generalized tracks (GTs) and two biogeographic nodes were obtained. The GTs did not completely superpose with the areas of open savanna present in Pleistocene, nor with the biotic tracks of some arthropods typical of arid cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fishtail points are highly abundant in the nearby Uruguayan plains, clearly extending to the border with Brazil (Nami, 2007(Nami, , 2013Flegenheimer et al, 2013), and it would be extremely unlikely that the current political frontier between the two countries represented a sharp limit to the distribution of these groups in the Late Pleistocene since it does not reflect any sort of real geographical or ecological barrier. Moreover, during this time the same biome covered this vast region, linking the southernmost Pampean plains with the territories of southern Brazil (De Vivo & Carmignotto, 2004;Morrone, 2006;Suárez & Santos, 2010;Gallo et al, 2013), with only small clinal variations being present until the 22˚S parallel (Bombin, 1976;Oliveira, 1996;Cartelle & Lessa, 1988;Carlini et al, 2004;Kerber et al, 2014). Specifically, this vast territory that reaches the southern part of São Paulo state includes all of the localities with FTPP as presented in this paper, except for the projectile points recovered from Minas Gerais and Bahia states (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fishtail points are highly abundant in the nearby Uruguayan plains, clearly extending to the border with Brazil (Nami, 2007(Nami, , 2013Flegenheimer et al, 2013), and it would be extremely unlikely that the current political frontier between the two countries represented a sharp limit to the distribution of these groups in the Late Pleistocene since it does not reflect any sort of real geographical or ecological barrier. Moreover, during this time the same biome covered this vast region, linking the southernmost Pampean plains with the territories of southern Brazil (De Vivo & Carmignotto, 2004;Morrone, 2006;Suárez & Santos, 2010;Gallo et al, 2013), with only small clinal variations being present until the 22˚S parallel (Bombin, 1976;Oliveira, 1996;Cartelle & Lessa, 1988;Carlini et al, 2004;Kerber et al, 2014). Specifically, this vast territory that reaches the southern part of São Paulo state includes all of the localities with FTPP as presented in this paper, except for the projectile points recovered from Minas Gerais and Bahia states (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Perhaps for this reason, they have been interpreted as a product of exchange with southern groups (e.g., Dias 2012). In this interpretation, the FPs were manufactured in the adjacent plains of Uruguay and perhaps in Argentina, but not in southern Brazil, which certainly was intriguing since the Uruguayan plain and most of southern Brazil constituted of the same biome during the end of the Pleistocene (and even today in some areas), with the same or similar faunal resources, and without significant topographic distortions (Adams & Faure 1997;Cione et al 2009: 128;Gallo et al 2009;Loponte & Carbonera 2017;Vivo & Carmignotto 2004). In fact, the southern states of Brazil, Uruguay and Northeast Argentina present a continuous distribution of other points (early and middle Holocene) from the so-called Umbú Tradition (Nami 2020a;Okumura & Araujo 2014;Prous 1992: 148-149;Rodríguez 2005).…”
Section: The Record Of Fps In South Brazilmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A presença de ambos os Megatheriidae no registro fossilífero caçapavano demonstra que a região constituía, já no final do Pleistoceno, uma zona de transição entre os ambientes de parque, aos quais o Eremotherium era adaptado, e ambientes abertos pampeanos, habitats preferenciais do gênero Megatherium (GALLO et al, 2013). As flutuações climáticas modificavam o ambiente de forma cíclica: em períodos glaciais, a região ficava mais seca e fria, permitindo o avanço dos campos e o predomínio do Megatherium; em períodos Geoturismo na área de abranGência do corede campanha ('metade sul' do rio Grande do sul, brasil), parte ii: elementos Geopatrimoniais ex situ, contextos e identidades quentes, interglaciais, elementos florestais e espécies de clima mais quente e úmido se tornavam predominantes, propiciando a chegada de Eremotherium.…”
Section: Elementos Geopatrimoniais Ex Situ -Fósseis Do Corede Campanhaunclassified