2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652012000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproduction and structure of the population of the Chaetognath Parasagitta friderici in Guanabara Bay (Brazil) based on short term sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although existing data on P. friderici are scarce and scattered, they suggest a general trend of continuous reproduction and recruitment with sporadic peaks commonly during spring, as well as higher proportion of adults in late summer and/or early autumn which is probably food-related according to the present data. This pattern includes populations from tropical (Mendes et al ., 2012), subtropical (Furnestin, 1957; Liang et al ., 2003; this study) and temperate (~38°S; Ramírez & Viñas, 1982; Daponte et al ., 2004) latitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although existing data on P. friderici are scarce and scattered, they suggest a general trend of continuous reproduction and recruitment with sporadic peaks commonly during spring, as well as higher proportion of adults in late summer and/or early autumn which is probably food-related according to the present data. This pattern includes populations from tropical (Mendes et al ., 2012), subtropical (Furnestin, 1957; Liang et al ., 2003; this study) and temperate (~38°S; Ramírez & Viñas, 1982; Daponte et al ., 2004) latitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole samples taken with the 200 µm mesh net (N = 72) were analysed under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss, Stemi, 2000) and the chaetognaths were separated, identified (mainly following Casanova, 1999) and quantified. The dominant Parasagitta friderici was further classified as either juvenile or adult following standard classification of the species (Boltovskoy, 1975; Mendes et al ., 2012). Gelatinous organisms were also manually removed from the samples (Nogueira Júnior, 2012) and the rest of the 200 µm samples were used to estimate zooplankton wet weight (mostly copepods, cladocerans and other crustaceans) by gravimetry after removing the water excess with blotted paper (Omori & Ikeda, 1994), using a digital analytical balance (Lab Genius DL-224) with precision of 0.1 mg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%