2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652009000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinitesimal initial part of a singular foliation

Abstract: This work provides a necessary and sufficient condition to assure that two generalized curve singular foliations have the same reduction of singularities and same Camacho-Sad indices at each infinitely near point.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as it is shown in [11], two non dicritical CGC sharing a complex logarithmic model (equivalently with the same set of separatrices and with the same system of indices) of multiplicity ν are defined by 1-forms with the same ν-jet when we fix the coordinates. In the real case these properties are not satisfied.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, as it is shown in [11], two non dicritical CGC sharing a complex logarithmic model (equivalently with the same set of separatrices and with the same system of indices) of multiplicity ν are defined by 1-forms with the same ν-jet when we fix the coordinates. In the real case these properties are not satisfied.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, for generalized curve foliations we have that Lemma 2.2. [12] Assume that F is a non-dicritical generalized curve foliation. Let π : (X, P ) → (C 2 , 0) be a morphism composition of a finite number of punctual blow-ups and take an irreducible component E of the exceptional divisor π −1 (0) with P ∈ E. Then, the strict transforms π * F and π * G f satisfy that…”
Section: Local Invariants Of Foliations and Intersection Multiplicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and ω E F by a constant. Moreover, if we consider (x l , y l ) coordinates centered at P E l with x l = x p and y l = y p − d E l , the equality of the Newton polygons [12], Lemma 1) and we can write…”
Section: Hence If E Is a Non-collinear Divisor We Have Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%