2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652004000200010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination sensitivity and processing of communication calls in the inferior colliculus of the Moustached Bat Pteronotus parnellii

Abstract: Many animals use complex communication calls in social behaviors. In some species we know the features in the calls that elicit particular behaviors, but we do not understand how the auditory system encodes the calls. Nor do we understand the mechanisms underlying neural selectivity to calls. Our studies of the auditory midbrain of the Moustached Bat Pteronotus parnellii have revealed a neural mechanism important for generating selective responses to calls. Neurons that integrate information across different f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficient encoding of conspecific vocalizations may be facilitated by neurons in the IC that respond to specific acoustic features found in vocalizations such as frequency modulations (Woolley and Casseday, 2005;Andoni et al, 2007), amplitude modulations (McAlpine, 2004;Woolley and Casseday, 2005), duration (Brand et al, 2000;Pérez-González et al, 2006), and/or combination sensitivity (Portfors and Wenstrup, 1999;Portfors, 2004). Although previous studies focused on feature selectivity by individual neurons to synthetic stimuli or token vocalizations, it is unknown whether the IC uses heterogeneity and/or selectivity to efficiently encode natural stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient encoding of conspecific vocalizations may be facilitated by neurons in the IC that respond to specific acoustic features found in vocalizations such as frequency modulations (Woolley and Casseday, 2005;Andoni et al, 2007), amplitude modulations (McAlpine, 2004;Woolley and Casseday, 2005), duration (Brand et al, 2000;Pérez-González et al, 2006), and/or combination sensitivity (Portfors and Wenstrup, 1999;Portfors, 2004). Although previous studies focused on feature selectivity by individual neurons to synthetic stimuli or token vocalizations, it is unknown whether the IC uses heterogeneity and/or selectivity to efficiently encode natural stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These neurons display non-linear facilitation or inhibition in response to two tones of different frequencies presented together, compared to the summed responses to the tones presented separately. Recently, combination-sensitive neurons have been shown to be selective for species-specific communication sounds in the bat IC (Portfors, 2004). Combination-sensitive neurons are present in the mouse IC (Portfors and Felix II, 2005), and it is likely that they play a role in the processing of complex sounds, including social vocalizations.…”
Section: Combination-sensitive Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the strength of inhibition in the IC decreases in aging C57 mice (Willott et al, 1997), and this may account for combination-sensitive inhibitory units being more susceptible to loss. Because it is thought that combination-sensitivity may underlie aspects of communication-sound processing (Portfors, 2004), any loss of these neurons may affect the animal's ability to encode and perceive communication sounds. However, this remains to be tested and understood.…”
Section: Combination-sensitive Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations