2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652002000300013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonics and paleogeography of the Marajó Basin, northern Brazil

Abstract: The Marajó Basin area presents geologic and geomorphologic features chiefly due to the Mesozoic extension and post-Miocene neotectonics. The extension event with an Early and a Late Cretaceous phases originated four sub-basins that constitutes the Marajó Basin, with a thick continental clastic sequence showing marine influence. NW and NNW normal faults and NE and ENE strike-slip faults controlled the basin geometry. The extension, related to the Equatorial Atlantic opening, propagated into the continent along … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
24
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…2). The latter basin consists of an assemblage of genetically related taphrogenic sub-basins ( Figs Villegas (1994) and Costa et al (2002).…”
Section: Amazonia Structural Arches Genesis and Paleogeography Gurupámentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The latter basin consists of an assemblage of genetically related taphrogenic sub-basins ( Figs Villegas (1994) and Costa et al (2002).…”
Section: Amazonia Structural Arches Genesis and Paleogeography Gurupámentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the several drainage anomalies are commonly related to tectonic influenced streams (e.g., Holmes, 1965;Howard, 1967;Ouchi, 1985;Summerfield, 1991). In combination, the NWeSE and NEeSW main modes, and the secondary EeW mode of the morphostructural lineaments coincide with main fault zone trends documented in other Amazonian areas Costa and Hasuy, 1997;Costa et al, 2002).…”
Section: Evidence Of Tectonic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…An increasing number of publications has proposed tectonic activity in this region in the Neogene (e.g., Costa and Hasuy, 1997;Costa et al, 2002;Bemerguy et al, 2002;Rossetti, 2006) and Quaternary (Costa et al, 2001;Bezerra, 2003;Miranda et al, 2009;Rossetti, 2010). However, two main problems must be approached: 1. field data must demonstrate tectonic structures in this area (at the moment, the data available derive mostly from analysis of morphostructural lineaments extracted from modern drainage networks); and 2. there has been no discussion on the most likely deformation mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os processos tectônicos nestas bacias mostraram-se efetivos não só durante o tempo da fragmentação principal, mas permaneceram ativos durante o Cretáceo e Cenozóico (Costa e Hasui, 1997;Costa et al, 1993Costa et al, , 1996Costa et al, , 2002. No Mioceno, destaca-se o desenvolvimento de tectonismo em regime de transcorrência, refletido em falhas normais NW-SE e transcorrentes E-W e NE-SW (Costa et al, 1993(Costa et al, , 1995Hasui, 1990;Costa et al, 1996;Ferreira Jr. et al, 1996), que têm continuidade até o Recente.…”
Section: Arcabouço Geológicounclassified